Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaume de Dios Pont

dblp:247/9371 · also Jaume de Dios 0001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2921-960XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 39% Mathematical optimization · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 19%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
log-concave sampling
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Computational complexity
query complexity
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Computational complexity › lower bounds
sampling lower bounds
1.422024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024
Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling · FOCS 2023
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.812024
Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling · J. ACM 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wishart matrix · 1.4block krylov algorithms · 1.4product distributions · 0.9biased fourier analysis · 0.9query lower bounds · 0.8reduction · 0.7multiscale construction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Predicting quantum channels over general product distributions
abstract
We investigate the problem of predicting the output behavior of unknown quantum channels. Given query access to an $n$-qubit channel $\mathcal{E}$ and an observable $\mathcal{O}$, we aim to learn the mapping \begin{equation*} \rho \mapsto \Tr(\mathcal{O} \mathcal{E}[\rho]) \end{equation*} to within a small error for most $\rho$ sampled from a distribution $\mathcal{D}$. Previously, Huang et al. proved a surprising result that even if $\mathcal{E}$ is arbitrary, this task can be solved in time roughly $n^{O(\log(1/\epsilon))}$, where $\epsilon$ is the target prediction error. However, their guarantee applied only to input distributions $\mathcal{D}$ invariant under all single-qubit Clifford gates, and their algorithm fails for important cases such as general product distributions over product states $\rho$. In this work, we propose a new approach that achieves accurate prediction over essentially any product distribution $\mathcal{D}$, provided it is not “classical” in which case there is a trivial exponential lower bound. Our method employs a “biased Pauli analysis,” analogous to classical biased Fourier analysis. Implementing this approach requires overcoming several challenges unique to the quantum setting, including the lack of a basis with appropriate orthogonality properties. The techniques we develop to address these issues may have broader applications in quantum information.
Sitan Chen, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jane Lange, Jerry Li 0001
COLT2
2024 Query Lower Bounds for Log-concave Sampling
abstract
Log-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving lower bounds for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension \(d\ge 2\) requires \(\Omega (\log \kappa)\) queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d ) requires \(\widetilde{\Omega }(\min (\sqrt \kappa \log d, d))\) queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here, \(\kappa\) denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature.
Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan
J. ACM2
2023 Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling
abstract
Log-concave sampling has witnessed remarkable algorithmic advances in recent years, but the corresponding problem of proving $\lt$bold$\gt$lower bounds$\lt$/bold$\gt$ for this task has remained elusive, with lower bounds previously known only in dimension one. In this work, we establish the following query lower bounds: (1) sampling from strongly log-concave and log-smooth distributions in dimension $d \geq 2$ requires $\Omega(\log \kappa)$ queries, which is sharp in any constant dimension, and (2) sampling from Gaussians in dimension d (hence also from general logconcave and log-smooth distributions in dimension d) requires $\widetilde{\Omega}(\min (\sqrt{\kappa} \log d, d))$ queries, which is nearly sharp for the class of Gaussians. Here $\kappa$ denotes the condition number of the target distribution. Our proofs rely upon (1) a multiscale construction inspired by work on the Kakeya conjecture in geometric measure theory, and (2) a novel reduction that demonstrates that block Krylov algorithms are optimal for this problem, as well as connections to lower bound techniques based on Wishart matrices developed in the matrix-vector query literature.
Sinho Chewi, Jaume de Dios Pont, Jerry Li 0001, Chen Lu 0002, Shyam Narayanan
FOCS2