Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas M. Loening
dblp:247/9375
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › biomedical text mining
clinical text analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
domain-specific language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
joint entity and relation extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language Evaluations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised pretraining · 0.7language model benchmarking · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | RaLEs: a Benchmark for Radiology Language EvaluationsabstractThe radiology report is the main form of communication between radiologists and other clinicians. Prior work in natural language processing in radiology reports has shown the value of developing methods tailored for individual tasks such as identifying reports with critical results or disease detection. Meanwhile, English and biomedical natural language understanding benchmarks such as the General Language Understanding and Evaluation as well as Biomedical Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark have motivated the development of models that can be easily adapted to address many tasks in those domains. Here, we characterize the radiology report as a distinct domain and introduce RaLEs, the Radiology Language Evaluations, as a benchmark for natural language understanding and generation in radiology. RaLEs is comprised of seven natural language understanding and generation evaluations including the extraction of anatomical and disease entities and their relations, procedure selection, and report summarization. We characterize the performance of models designed for the general, biomedical, clinical and radiology domains across these tasks. We find that advances in the general and biomedical domains do not necessarily translate to radiology, and that improved models from the general domain can perform comparably to smaller clinical-specific models. The limited performance of existing pre-trained models on RaLEs highlights the opportunity to improve domain-specific self-supervised models for natural language processing in radiology. We propose RaLEs as a benchmark to promote and track the development of such domain-specific radiology language models. Juanma Zambrano Chaves, Nandita Bhaskhar, Maayane Attias, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Daniel L. Rubin, Andreas M. Loening, Curt Langlotz, Akshay Chaudhari |
NeurIPS | 6 |