Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johannes Haug
dblp:248/5381
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1286-3551ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data stream processing · 67% Data mining · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 72% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data stream processing › evolving data
concept drift |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream Learning · ICDE 2022 |
Data mining
interpretable machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream Learning · ICDE 2022 |
Data stream processing › stream mining
stream classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream Learning · ICDE 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data reduction
online feature selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Leveraging Model Inherent Variable Importance for Stable Online Feature Selection · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream Learning · ICDE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model tree · 1.1hoeffding trees · 0.6hoeffding tree · 0.6model parameter uncertainty · 0.4feature weighting · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A SurveyabstractHeterogeneous tabular data are the most commonly used form of data and are essential for numerous critical and computationally demanding applications. On homogeneous datasets, deep neural networks have repeatedly shown excellent performance and have therefore been widely adopted. However, their adaptation to tabular data for inference or data generation tasks remains highly challenging. To facilitate further progress in the field, this work provides an overview of state-of-the-art deep learning methods for tabular data. We categorize these methods into three groups: data transformations, specialized architectures, and regularization models. For each of these groups, our work offers a comprehensive overview of the main approaches. Moreover, we discuss deep learning approaches for generating tabular data and also provide an overview over strategies for explaining deep models on tabular data. Thus, our first contribution is to address the main research streams and existing methodologies in the mentioned areas while highlighting relevant challenges and open research questions. Our second contribution is to provide an empirical comparison of traditional machine learning methods with 11 deep learning approaches across five popular real-world tabular datasets of different sizes and with different learning objectives. Our results, which we have made publicly available as competitive benchmarks, indicate that algorithms based on gradient-boosted tree ensembles still mostly outperform deep learning models on supervised learning tasks, suggesting that the research progress on competitive deep learning models for tabular data is stagnating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth overview of deep learning approaches for tabular data; as such, this work can serve as a valuable starting point to guide researchers and practitioners interested in deep learning with tabular data. Vadim Borisov, Tobias Leemann, Kathrin Seßler, Johannes Haug, Martin Pawelczyk, Gjergji Kasneci |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 4 |
| 2022 | Change Detection for Local Explainability in Evolving Data StreamsabstractAs complex machine learning models are increasingly used in sensitive applications like banking, trading or credit scoring, there is a growing demand for reliable explanation mechanisms. Local feature attribution methods have become a popular technique for post-hoc and model-agnostic explanations. However, attribution methods typically assume a stationary environment in which the predictive model has been trained and remains stable. As a result, it is often unclear how local attributions behave in realistic, constantly evolving settings such as streaming and online applications. In this paper, we discuss the impact of temporal change on local feature attributions. In particular, we show that local attributions can become obsolete each time the predictive model is updated or concept drift alters the data generating distribution. Consequently, local feature attributions in data streams provide high explanatory power only when combined with a mechanism that allows us to detect and respond to local changes over time. To this end, we present CDLEEDS, a flexible and model-agnostic framework for detecting local change and concept drift. CDLEEDS serves as an intuitive extension of attribution-based explanation techniques to identify outdated local attributions and enable more targeted recalculations. In experiments, we also show that the proposed framework can reliably detect both local and global concept drift. Accordingly, our work contributes to a more meaningful and robust explainability in online machine learning. Johannes Haug, Stefan Zürn, Gjergji Kasneci |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2022 | Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream LearningabstractData streams are ubiquitous in modern business and society. In practice, data streams may evolve over time and cannot be stored indefinitely. Effective and transparent machine learning on data streams is thus often challenging. Hoeffding Trees have emerged as a state-of-the art for online predictive modelling. They are easy to train and provide meaningful convergence guarantees under a stationary process. Yet, at the same time, Hoeffding Trees often require heuristic and costly extensions to adjust to distributional change, which may considerably impair their interpretability. In this work, we revisit Model Trees for machine learning in evolving data streams. Model Trees are able to maintain more flexible and locally robust representations of the active data concept, making them a natural fit for data stream applications. Our novel framework, called Dynamic Model Tree, satisfies desirable consistency and minimality properties. In experiments with synthetic and real-world tabular streaming data sets, we show that the proposed framework can drastically reduce the number of splits required by existing incremental decision trees. At the same time, our framework often outperforms state-of-the-art models in terms of predictive quality - especially when concept drift is involved. Dynamic Model Trees are thus a powerful online learning framework that contributes to more lightweight and interpretable machine learning in data streams. Johannes Haug, Klaus Broelemann, Gjergji Kasneci |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning Parameter Distributions to Detect Concept Drift in Data StreamsabstractData distributions in streaming environments are usually not stationary. In order to maintain a high predictive quality at all times, online learning models need to adapt to distributional changes, which are known as concept drift. The timely and robust identification of concept drift can be difficult, as we never have access to the true distribution of streaming data. In this work, we propose a novel framework for the detection of real concept drift, called ERICS. By treating the parameters of a predictive model as random variables, we show that concept drift corresponds to a change in the distribution of optimal parameters. To this end, we adopt common measures from information theory. The proposed framework is completely model-agnostic. By choosing an appropriate base model, ERICS is also capable to detect concept drift at the input level, which is a significant advantage over existing approaches. An evaluation on several synthetic and real-world data sets suggests that the proposed framework identifies concept drift more effectively and precisely than various existing works. Johannes Haug, Gjergji Kasneci |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Leveraging Model Inherent Variable Importance for Stable Online Feature SelectionabstractFeature selection can be a crucial factor in obtaining robust and accurate predictions. Online feature selection models, however, operate under considerable restrictions; they need to efficiently extract salient input features based on a bounded set of observations, while enabling robust and accurate predictions. In this work, we introduce FIRES, a novel framework for online feature selection. The proposed feature weighting mechanism leverages the importance information inherent in the parameters of a predictive model. By treating model parameters as random variables, we can penalize features with high uncertainty and thus generate more stable feature sets. Our framework is generic in that it leaves the choice of the underlying model to the user. Strikingly, experiments suggest that the model complexity has only a minor effect on the discriminative power and stability of the selected feature sets. In fact, using a simple linear model, FIRES obtains feature sets that compete with state-of-the-art methods, while dramatically reducing computation time. In addition, experiments show that the proposed framework is clearly superior in terms of feature selection stability. Johannes Haug, Martin Pawelczyk, Klaus Broelemann, Gjergji Kasneci |
KDD | 1 |
| 2019 | CancelOut: A Layer for Feature Selection in Deep Neural Networks
Vadim Borisov, Johannes Haug, Gjergji Kasneci |
ICANN (2) | 2 |