Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuxuan Yu

dblp:248/7575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-9146-2275ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 50% User interface design and tools · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational fabrication · 77% Computer animation and physical simulation · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational fabrication › additive manufacturing
4d printing
0.412020
Material characterization and precise finite element analysis of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for 4D printing · Comput. Aided Des. 2020
User interface design and tools
design tools
0.412020
SimuLearn: Fast and Accurate Simulator to Support Morphing Materials Design and Workflows · UIST 2020
Computational science and engineering
finite element analysis
0.112020
Material characterization and precise finite element analysis of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for 4D printing · Comput. Aided Des. 2020
Computer animation and physical simulation
finite element method
0.112020
SimuLearn: Fast and Accurate Simulator to Support Morphing Materials Design and Workflows · UIST 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite element analysis · 1.7machine learning · 0.9dynamic mechanical analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 SimuLearn: Fast and Accurate Simulator to Support Morphing Materials Design and Workflows
abstract
Morphing materials allow us to create new modalities of interaction and fabrication by leveraging the materials? dynamic behaviors. Yet, despite the ongoing rapid growth of computational tools within this realm, current developments are bottlenecked by the lack of an effective simulation method. As a result, existing design tools must trade-off between speed and accuracy to support a real-time interactive design scenario. In response, we introduce SimuLearn, a data-driven method that combines finite element analysis and machine learning to create real-time (0.61 seconds) and truthful (97% accuracy) morphing material simulators. We use mesh-like 4D printed structures to contextualize this method and prototype design tools to exemplify the design workflows and spaces enabled by a fast and accurate simulation method. Situating this work among existing literature, we believe SimuLearn is a timely addition to the HCI CAD toolbox that can enable the proliferation of morphing materials.
Humphrey Yang, Kuanren Qian, Yuxuan Yu, Jianzhe Gu, Matthew McGehee, Yongjie Jessica Zhang, Lining Yao
UIST4
2020 Material characterization and precise finite element analysis of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for 4D printing
abstract
Four-dimensional (4D) printing, a new technology emerged from additive manufacturing (3D printing), is widely known for its capability of programming post-fabrication shape-changing into artifacts. Fused deposition modeling (FDM)-based 4D printing, in particular, uses thermoplastics to produce artifacts and requires computational analysis to assist the design processes of complex geometries. However, these artifacts are weak against structural loads, and the design quality can be limited by less accurate material models and numerical simulations. To address these issues, this paper propounds a composite structure design made of two materials – polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon fiber reinforced PLA (CFPLA) – to increase the structural strength of 4D printed artifacts and a workflow composed of several physical experiments and series of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) to characterize materials. We apply this workflow to 3D printed samples fabricated with different printed parameters to accurately characterize the materials and implement a sequential finite element analysis (FEA) to achieve accurate simulations. The accuracy of deformation induced by the triggering process is both computationally and experimentally verified with several creative design examples and is measured to be at least 95%, with a confidence interval of (0.972,0.985). We believe the presented workflow is essential to the combination of geometry, material mechanism and design, and has various potential applications.
Yuxuan Yu, Kuanren Qian, Humphrey Yang, Matthew McGehee, Jianzhe Gu, Danli Luo, Lining Yao, Yongjie Jessica Zhang
Comput. Aided Des.1