Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sai Sree Parvathaneni
dblp:248/7616
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization › approximate query processing
stratified sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization
aggregate query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization › aggregate query processing
group-by query |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coefficient of variation optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Random Sampling for Group-By QueriesabstractRandom sampling has been widely used in approximate query processing on large databases, due to its potential to significantly reduce resource usage and response times, at the cost of a small approximation error. We consider random sampling for answering the ubiquitous class of group-by queries, which first group data according to one or more attributes, and then aggregate within each group after filtering through a predicate. The challenge with group-by queries is that a sampling method cannot focus on optimizing the quality of a single answer (e.g. the mean of selected data), but must simultaneously optimize the quality of a set of answers (one per group). We present CVOPT, a query- and data-driven sampling framework for a set of group-by queries. To evaluate the quality of a sample, CVOPT defines a metric based on the norm (e.g. ℓ2or ℓ∞) of the coefficients of variation (CVs) of different answers, and constructs a stratified sample that provably optimizes the metric. CVOPT can handle group-by queries on data where groups have vastly different statistical characteristics, such as frequencies, means, or variances. CVOPT jointly optimizes for multiple aggregations and multiple group-by clauses, and provides a way to prioritize specific groups or aggregates. It can be tuned to cases when partial information about a query workload is known, such as a data warehouse where queries are run periodically. Our experimental results show that CVOPT outperforms the current state-of-the-art on sample quality and estimation accuracy for group-by queries. On a set of queries on two real-world data sets, CVOPT yields relative errors that are 5× smaller than competing approaches, under the same space budget. Trong Duc Nguyen, Ming-Hung Shih, Sai Sree Parvathaneni, Bojian Xu, Divesh Srivastava, Srikanta Tirthapura |
ICDE | 3 |