Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sai Sree Parvathaneni

dblp:248/7616 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing
0.412020
Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020
Query processing and optimization › approximate query processing
stratified sampling
0.412020
Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020
Query processing and optimization
aggregate query processing
0.112020
Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020
Query processing and optimization › aggregate query processing
group-by query
0.112020
Random Sampling for Group-By Queries · ICDE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

coefficient of variation optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Random Sampling for Group-By Queries
abstract
Random sampling has been widely used in approximate query processing on large databases, due to its potential to significantly reduce resource usage and response times, at the cost of a small approximation error. We consider random sampling for answering the ubiquitous class of group-by queries, which first group data according to one or more attributes, and then aggregate within each group after filtering through a predicate. The challenge with group-by queries is that a sampling method cannot focus on optimizing the quality of a single answer (e.g. the mean of selected data), but must simultaneously optimize the quality of a set of answers (one per group). We present CVOPT, a query- and data-driven sampling framework for a set of group-by queries. To evaluate the quality of a sample, CVOPT defines a metric based on the norm (e.g. ℓ2or ℓ∞) of the coefficients of variation (CVs) of different answers, and constructs a stratified sample that provably optimizes the metric. CVOPT can handle group-by queries on data where groups have vastly different statistical characteristics, such as frequencies, means, or variances. CVOPT jointly optimizes for multiple aggregations and multiple group-by clauses, and provides a way to prioritize specific groups or aggregates. It can be tuned to cases when partial information about a query workload is known, such as a data warehouse where queries are run periodically. Our experimental results show that CVOPT outperforms the current state-of-the-art on sample quality and estimation accuracy for group-by queries. On a set of queries on two real-world data sets, CVOPT yields relative errors that are 5× smaller than competing approaches, under the same space budget.
Trong Duc Nguyen, Ming-Hung Shih, Sai Sree Parvathaneni, Bojian Xu, Divesh Srivastava, Srikanta Tirthapura
ICDE3