Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bram Wallace
dblp:248/7801
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 77% 3D vision · 15% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 8% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization · CVPR 2024 End-to-End Diffusion Latent Optimization Improves Classifier Guidance · ICCV 2023 EDICT: Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled Transformations · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model adaptation
diffusion model alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier guidance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Diffusion Latent Optimization Improves Classifier Guidance · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion inversion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDICT: Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled Transformations · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
latent space optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Diffusion Latent Optimization Improves Classifier Guidance · ICCV 2023 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDICT: Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled Transformations · CVPR 2023 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
real image editing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EDICT: Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled Transformations · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Few-Shot Generalization for Single-Image 3D Reconstruction via Priors · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › learning-based 3d reconstruction
few-shot 3d reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Few-Shot Generalization for Single-Image 3D Reconstruction via Priors · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
single-view 3d reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Few-Shot Generalization for Single-Image 3D Reconstruction via Priors · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Diffusion Latent Optimization Improves Classifier Guidance · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Few-Shot Generalization for Single-Image 3D Reconstruction via Priors · ICCV 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
denoising diffusion implicit model · 1.3affine coupling layer · 1.3reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8diffusion model · 0.7classifier gradient guidance · 0.7CLIP · 0.7task tangent kernel · 0.5pseudo-labeling · 0.5self-supervised learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference OptimizationabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are fine-tuned using human comparison data with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) methods to make them better aligned with users' preferences. In contrast to LLMs, human preference learning has not been widely explored in text-to-image diffusion models; the best existing approach is to fine-tune a pretrained model using carefully curated high quality images and captions to improve visual appeal and text alignment. We propose Diffusion-DPO, a method to align diffusion models to human preferences by directly optimizing on human comparison data. Diffusion-DPO is adapted from the recently developed Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) [36], a simpler alternative to RLHF which directly optimizes a policy that best satisfies human preferences under a classification objective. We re-formulate DPO to account for a diffusion model notion of likelihood, utilizing the evidence lower bound to derive a differentiable objective. Using the Pick-a-Pic dataset of 851K crowdsourced pairwise preferences, we fine-tune the base model of the state-of-the-art Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL)-1.0 model with Diffusion-DPO. Our fine-tuned base model significantly outperforms both base SDXL-1.0 and the larger SDXL-1.0 model consisting of an additional refinement model in human evaluation, improving visual appeal and prompt alignment. We also develop a variant that uses AI feedback and has comparable performance to training on human preferences, opening the door for scaling of diffusion model alignment methods. Bram Wallace, Meihua Dang, Rafael Rafailov, Linqi Zhou, Aaron Lou, Senthil Purushwalkam, Stefano Ermon, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq R. Joty |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | EDICT: Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled TransformationsabstractFinding an initial noise vector that produces an input image when fed into the diffusion process (known as inversion) is an important problem in denoising diffusion models (DDMs), with applications for real image editing. The standard approach for real image editing with inversion uses denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIMs [29]) to deterministically noise the image to the intermediate state along the path that the denoising would follow given the original conditioning. However, DDIM inversion for real images is unstable as it relies on local linearization assumptions, which result in the propagation of errors, leading to incorrect image reconstruction and loss of content. To alleviate these problems, we propose Exact Diffusion Inversion via Coupled Transformations (EDICT), an inversion method that draws inspiration from affine coupling layers. EDICT enables mathematically exact inversion of real and model-generated images by maintaining two coupled noise vectors which are used to invert each other in an alternating fashion. Using Stable Diffusion [25], a state-of-the-art latent diffusion model, we demonstrate that EDICT successfully reconstructs real images with high fidelity. On complex image datasets like MS-COCO, EDICT reconstruction significantly outperforms DDIM, improving the mean square error of reconstruction by a factor of two. Using noise vectors inverted from real images, EDICT enables a wide range of image edits—from local and global semantic edits to image stylization—while maintaining fidelity to the original image structure. EDICT requires no model training/finetuning, prompt tuning, or extra data and can be combined with any pretrained DDM. Bram Wallace, Akash Gokul |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | End-to-End Diffusion Latent Optimization Improves Classifier GuidanceabstractClassifier guidance—using the gradients of an image classifier to steer the generations of a diffusion model—has the potential to dramatically expand the creative control over image generation and editing. However, currently classifier guidance requires either training new noise-aware models to obtain accurate gradients or using a one-step denoising approximation of the final generation, which leads to misaligned gradients and sub-optimal control. We highlight this approximation’s shortcomings and propose a novel guidance method: Direct Optimization of Diffusion Latents (DOODL), which enables plug-and-play guidance by optimizing diffusion latents w.r.t. the gradients of a pre-trained classifier on the true generated pixels, using an invertible diffusion process to achieve memory-efficient backpropagation. Showcasing the potential of more precise guidance, DOODL outperforms one-step classifier guidance on computational and human evaluation metrics across different forms of guidance: using CLIP guidance to improve generations of complex prompts from DrawBench, using fine-grained visual classifiers to expand the vocabulary of Stable Diffusion, enabling image-conditioned generation with a CLIP visual encoder, and improving image aesthetics using an aesthetic scoring network. Bram Wallace, Akash Gokul, Stefano Ermon |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Can We Characterize Tasks Without Labels or Features?abstractThe problem of expert model selection deals with choosing the appropriate pretrained network ("expert") to transfer to a target task. Methods, however, generally depend on two separate assumptions: the presence of labeled images and access to powerful "probe" networks that yield useful features. In this work, we demonstrate the current reliance on both of these aspects and develop algorithms to operate when either of these assumptions fail. In the unlabeled case, we show that pseudolabels from the probe network provide discriminative enough gradients to perform nearly-equal task selection even when the probe network is trained on imagery unrelated to the tasks. To compute the embedding with no probe network at all, we introduce the Task Tangent Kernel (TTK) which uses a kernelized distance across multiple random networks to achieve performance over double that of other methods with randomly initialized models. Code is available at https://github.com/BramSW/task_characterization_cvpr_2021/. Bram Wallace, Ziyang Wu, Bharath Hariharan |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Extending and Analyzing Self-supervised Learning Across Domains
Bram Wallace, Bharath Hariharan |
ECCV (26) | 1 |
| 2019 | Few-Shot Generalization for Single-Image 3D Reconstruction via PriorsabstractRecent work on single-view 3D reconstruction shows impressive results, but has been restricted to a few fixed categories where extensive training data is available. The problem of generalizing these models to new classes with limited training data is largely open. To address this problem, we present a new model architecture that reframes single-view 3D reconstruction as learnt, category agnostic refinement of a provided, category-specific prior. The provided prior shape for a novel class can be obtained from as few as one 3D shape from this class. Our model can start reconstructing objects from the novel class using this prior without seeing any training image for this class and without any retraining. Our model outperforms category-agnostic baselines and remains competitive with more sophisticated baselines that finetune on the novel categories. Additionally, our network is capable of improving the reconstruction given multiple views despite not being trained on task of multi-view reconstruction. Bram Wallace, Bharath Hariharan |
ICCV | 1 |