Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Adkins
dblp:248/7905
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 61% Digital forensics and information hiding · 30% Malware analysis · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding
digital forensics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Novel AI-based Methodology for Identifying Cyber Attacks in Honey Pots · AAAI 2021 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection › intrusion detection system
host-based intrusion detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Novel AI-based Methodology for Identifying Cyber Attacks in Honey Pots · AAAI 2021 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Novel AI-based Methodology for Identifying Cyber Attacks in Honey Pots · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.5learned classifier · 0.5latent-state probabilistic model · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Novel AI-based Methodology for Identifying Cyber Attacks in Honey PotsabstractWe present a novel AI-based methodology that identifies phases of a host-level cyber attack simply from system call logs. System calls emanating from cyber attacks on hosts such as honey pots are often recorded in audit logs. Our methodology first involves efficiently loading, caching, processing, and querying system events contained in audit logs in support of computer forensics. Output of queries remains at the system call level and is difficult to process. The next step is to infer a sequence of abstracted actions, which we colloquially call a storyline, from the system calls given as observations to a latent-state probabilistic model. These storylines are then accurately identified with class labels using a learned classifier. We qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate methods and models for each step of the methodology using 114 different attack phases collected by logging the attacks of a red team on a server, on some likely benign sequences containing regular user activities, and on traces from a recent DARPA project. The resulting end-to-end system, which we call Cyberian, identifies the attack phases with a high level of accuracy illustrating the benefit that this machine learning-based methodology brings to security forensics. Muhammed AbuOdeh, Christian Adkins, Omid Setayeshfar, Prashant Doshi, Kyu Hyung Lee |
AAAI | 2 |