Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Pilault

dblp:248/8053 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Language models and text generation · 17% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.812024
Course Correcting Koopman Representations · ICLR 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamic modeling
0.812024
Course Correcting Koopman Representations · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.712023
Block-State Transformers · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › prompt learning
prompt-based adaptation
0.712023
On Conditional and Compositional Language Model Differentiable Prompting · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.712023
Block-State Transformers · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model
0.712023
Block-State Transformers · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.512021
Conditionally Adaptive Multi-Task Learning: Improving Transfer Learning in NLP Using Fewer Parameters & Less Data · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
transfer learning for NLP
0.512021
Conditionally Adaptive Multi-Task Learning: Improving Transfer Learning in NLP Using Fewer Parameters & Less Data · ICLR 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.412020
On Extractive and Abstractive Neural Document Summarization with Transformer Language Models · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.412020
On Extractive and Abstractive Neural Document Summarization with Transformer Language Models · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling
0.212023
Block-State Transformers · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model
0.112020
On Extractive and Abstractive Neural Document Summarization with Transformer Language Models · EMNLP (1) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

koopman operator theory · 0.8autoencoder · 0.8transformer · 0.7state space model · 0.7production system · 0.7continuous prompt embedding · 0.7conditional computation · 0.5adapter modules · 0.5extractive-then-abstractive generation · 0.4copy mechanism · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Course Correcting Koopman Representations
abstract
Koopman representations aim to learn features of nonlinear dynamical systems (NLDS) which lead to linear dynamics in the latent space. Theoretically, such features can be used to simplify many problems in modeling and control of NLDS. In this work we study autoencoder formulations of this problem, and different ways they can be used to model dynamics, specifically for future state prediction over long horizons. We discover several limitations of predicting future states in the latent space and propose an inference-time mechanism, which we refer to as Periodic Reencoding, for faithfully capturing long term dynamics. We justify this method both analytically and empirically via experiments in low and high dimensional NLDS.
Mahan Fathi, Clement Gehring, Jonathan Pilault, David Kanaa, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Ross Goroshin
ICLR3
2023 On Conditional and Compositional Language Model Differentiable Prompting
abstract
Prompts have been shown to be an effective method to adapt a frozen Pretrained Language Model (PLM) to perform well on downstream tasks. Prompts can be represented by a human-engineered word sequence or by a learned continuous embedding. In this work, we investigate conditional and compositional differentiable prompting. We propose a new model, Prompt Production System (ProPS), which learns to transform task instructions or input metadata, into continuous prompts that elicit task-specific outputs from the PLM. Our model uses a modular network structure based on our neural formulation of Production Systems, which allows the model to learn discrete rules -- neural functions that learn to specialize in transforming particular prompt input patterns, making it suitable for compositional transfer learning and few-shot learning. We present extensive empirical and theoretical analysis and show that ProPS consistently surpasses other PLM adaptation techniques, and often improves upon fully fine-tuned models, on compositional generalization tasks, controllable summarization and multilingual translation, while needing fewer trainable parameters.
Jonathan Pilault, Mohit Bansal, Markus Dreyer
IJCAI1
2023 Interactive-Chain-Prompting: Ambiguity Resolution for Crosslingual Conditional Generation with Interaction
abstract
Jonathan Pilault, Xavier Garcia, Arthur Bražinskas, Orhan Firat. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Jonathan Pilault, Xavier Garcia, Arthur Brazinskas, Orhan Firat
IJCNLP (1)1
2023 Block-State Transformers
abstract
State space models (SSMs) have shown impressive results on tasks that require modeling long-range dependencies and efficiently scale to long sequences owing to their subquadratic runtime complexity. Originally designed for continuous signals, SSMs have shown superior performance on a plethora of tasks, in vision and audio; however, SSMs still lag Transformer performance in Language Modeling tasks. In this work, we propose a hybrid layer named Block-State Transformer (*BST*), that internally combines an SSM sublayer for long-range contextualization, and a Block Transformer sublayer for short-term representation of sequences. We study three different, and completely *parallelizable*, variants that integrate SSMs and block-wise attention. We show that our model outperforms similar Transformer-based architectures on language modeling perplexity and generalizes to longer sequences. In addition, the Block-State Transformer demonstrates a more than *tenfold* increase in speed at the layer level compared to the Block-Recurrent Transformer when model parallelization is employed.
Jonathan Pilault, Mahan Fathi, Orhan Firat, Christopher Joseph Pal, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Ross Goroshin
NeurIPS1
2021 Conditionally Adaptive Multi-Task Learning: Improving Transfer Learning in NLP Using Fewer Parameters & Less Data
Jonathan Pilault, Amine Elhattami, Christopher Joseph Pal
ICLR1
2020 On Extractive and Abstractive Neural Document Summarization with Transformer Language Models
abstract
We present a method to produce abstractive summaries of long documents that exceed several thousand words via neural abstractive summarization.We perform a simple extractive step before generating a summary, which is then used to condition the transformer language model on relevant information before being tasked with generating a summary.We also show that this approach produces more abstractive summaries compared to prior work that employs a copy mechanism while still achieving higher ROUGE scores.We provide extensive comparisons with strong baseline methods, prior state of the art work as well as multiple variants of our approach including those using only transformers, only extractive techniques and combinations of the two.We examine these models using four different summarization tasks and datasets: arXiv papers, PubMed papers, the Newsroom and BigPatent datasets.We find that transformer based methods produce summaries with fewer n-gram copies, leading to n-gram copying statistics that are more similar to human generated abstracts.We include a human evaluation, finding that transformers are ranked highly for coherence and fluency, but purely extractive methods score higher for informativeness and relevance.We hope that these architectures and experiments may serve as strong points of comparison for future work.
Jonathan Pilault, Raymond Li, Sandeep Subramanian, Christopher Joseph Pal
EMNLP (1)1