Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charuta Pethe

dblp:248/8095 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2648-4974ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
narrative alignment
0.712023
Analyzing Film Adaptation through Narrative Alignment · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
narrative understanding
0.412020
What time is it? Temporal Analysis of Novels · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text segmentation
0.412020
Chapter Captor: Text Segmentation in Novels · EMNLP (1) 2020
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
0.412019
The Trumpiest Trump? Identifying a Subject's Most Characteristic Tweets · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text similarity
0.212023
Analyzing Film Adaptation through Narrative Alignment · EMNLP 2023
Computational social science and digital humanities › cultural analytics
computational literary analysis
0.212023
Analyzing Film Adaptation through Narrative Alignment · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.112019
The Trumpiest Trump? Identifying a Subject's Most Characteristic Tweets · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smith-waterman alignment · 1.3SBERT embeddings · 1.3rule matching · 0.4neural inference · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4classification model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Analyzing Film Adaptation through Narrative Alignment
abstract
Novels are often adapted into feature films, but the differences between the two media usually require dropping sections of the source text from the movie script.Here we study this screen adaptation process by constructing narrative alignments using the Smith-Waterman local alignment algorithm coupled with SBERT embedding distance to quantify text similarity between scenes and book units.We use these alignments to perform an automated analysis of 40 adaptations, revealing insights into the screenwriting process concerning (i) faithfulness of adaptation, (ii) importance of dialog, (iii) preservation of narrative order, and (iv) gender representation issues reflective of the Bechdel test.
Tanzir Pial, Shahreen Salim Aunti, Charuta Pethe, Allen Kim, Steven Skiena
EMNLP3
2020 What time is it? Temporal Analysis of Novels
abstract
Recognizing the flow of time in a story is a crucial aspect of understanding it.Prior work related to time has primarily focused on identifying temporal expressions or relative sequencing of events, but here we propose computationally annotating each line of a book with wall clock times, even in the absence of explicit time-descriptive phrases.To do so, we construct a data set of hourly time phrases from 52,183 fictional books.We then construct a time-of-day classification model that achieves an average error of 2.27 hours.Furthermore, we show that by analyzing a book in whole using dynamic programming of breakpoints, we can roughly partition a book into segments that each correspond to a particular time-of-day.This approach improves upon baselines by over two hour.Finally, we apply our model to a corpus of literature categorized by different periods in history, to show interesting trends of hourly activity throughout the past.Among several observations we find that the fraction of events taking place past 10 P.M jumps past 1880 -coincident with the advent of the electric light bulb and city lights.
Allen Kim, Charuta Pethe, Steven Skiena
EMNLP (1)2
2020 Chapter Captor: Text Segmentation in Novels
abstract
Books are typically segmented into chapters and sections, representing coherent subnarratives and topics.We investigate the task of predicting chapter boundaries, as a proxy for the general task of segmenting long texts.We build a Project Gutenberg chapter segmentation data set of 9,126 English novels, using a hybrid approach combining neural inference and rule matching to recognize chapter title headers in books, achieving an F1-score of 0.77 on this task.Using this annotated data as ground truth after removing structural cues, we present cut-based and neural methods for chapter segmentation, achieving an F1-score of 0.453 on the challenging task of exact break prediction over book-length documents.Finally, we reveal interesting historical trends in the chapter structure of novels.
Charuta Pethe, Allen Kim, Steven Skiena
EMNLP (1)1
2019 The Trumpiest Trump? Identifying a Subject's Most Characteristic Tweets
abstract
Charuta Pethe, Steve Skiena. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Charuta Pethe, Steven Skiena
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)1