Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Feiqing Huang

dblp:248/8192 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% Language models and text generation · 12%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
clinical language model
0.812024
A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer
0.812024
A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
recurrent transformer
0.712023
Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.712023
Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
autoregressive neural networks
0.412020
Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long-range memory
0.412020
Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › low-rank approximation
low-rank tensor decomposition
0.412020
Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM
0.412020
Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412020
Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.412020
Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020
Privacy and data protection
anonymization
0.212024
A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

teacher-teacher framework · 1.5knowledge alignment · 1.5recurrence · 0.7tucker decomposition · 0.4tensor decomposition · 0.4statistical analysis · 0.4polynomial weight decay · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning
abstract
In recent years, there has been a proliferation of ready-to-use large language models (LLMs) designed for various applications, both general-purpose and domain-specific. Instead of advocating for the development of a new model or continuous pretraining of an existing one, this paper introduces a pragmatic teacher-teacher framework to facilitate mutual learning between two pre-existing models. By leveraging two teacher models possessing complementary knowledge, we introduce a LIghtweight kNowledge alignmEnt (LINE) module aimed at harmonizing their knowledge within a unified representation space. This framework is particularly valuable in clinical settings, where stringent regulations and privacy considerations dictate the handling of detailed clinical notes. Our trained LINE module excels in capturing critical information from clinical notes, leveraging highly de-identified data. Validation and downstream tasks further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Feiqing Huang, Shenghan Zhang, Sara Morini Sweet, Tianxi Cai
NeurIPS1
2023 Encoding Recurrence into Transformers
Feiqing Huang, Kexin Lu, Yuxi Cai, Yanwen Fang, Guangjian Tian
ICLR1
2020 Compact Autoregressive Network
abstract
Autoregressive networks can achieve promising performance in many sequence modeling tasks with short-range dependence. However, when handling high-dimensional inputs and outputs, the massive amount of parameters in the network leads to expensive computational cost and low learning efficiency. The problem can be alleviated slightly by introducing one more narrow hidden layer to the network, but the sample size required to achieve a certain training error is still substantial. To address this challenge, we rearrange the weight matrices of a linear autoregressive network into a tensor form, and then make use of Tucker decomposition to represent low-rank structures. This leads to a novel compact autoregressive network, called Tucker AutoRegressive (TAR) net. Interestingly, the TAR net can be applied to sequences with long-range dependence since the dimension along the sequential order is reduced. Theoretical studies show that the TAR net improves the learning efficiency, and requires much fewer samples for model training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed compact network.
Feiqing Huang, Jingyu Zhao 0001, Guangjian Tian
AAAI2
2020 Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory?
abstract
The LSTM network was proposed to overcome the difficulty in learning long-term dependence, and has made significant advancements in applications. With its success and drawbacks in mind, this paper raises the question - do RNN and LSTM have long memory? We answer it partially by proving that RNN and LSTM do not have long memory from a statistical perspective. A new definition for long memory networks is further introduced, and it requires the model weights to decay at a polynomial rate. To verify our theory, we convert RNN and LSTM into long memory networks by making a minimal modification, and their superiority is illustrated in modeling long-term dependence of various datasets.
Jingyu Zhao 0001, Feiqing Huang, Jia Lv, Yanjie Duan, Guangjian Tian
ICML2