Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Feiqing Huang
dblp:248/8192
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% Language models and text generation · 12% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
clinical language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
recurrent transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Encoding Recurrence into Transformers · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
autoregressive neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long-range memory |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › low-rank approximation
low-rank tensor decomposition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Compact Autoregressive Network · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory? · ICML 2020 |
Privacy and data protection
anonymization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
teacher-teacher framework · 1.5knowledge alignment · 1.5recurrence · 0.7tucker decomposition · 0.4tensor decomposition · 0.4statistical analysis · 0.4polynomial weight decay · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A teacher-teacher framework for clinical language representation learningabstractIn recent years, there has been a proliferation of ready-to-use large language models (LLMs) designed for various applications, both general-purpose and domain-specific. Instead of advocating for the development of a new model or continuous pretraining of an existing one, this paper introduces a pragmatic teacher-teacher framework to facilitate mutual learning between two pre-existing models.
By leveraging two teacher models possessing complementary knowledge, we introduce a LIghtweight kNowledge alignmEnt (LINE) module aimed at harmonizing their knowledge within a unified representation space. This framework is particularly valuable in clinical settings, where stringent regulations and privacy considerations dictate the handling of detailed clinical notes. Our trained LINE module excels in capturing critical information from clinical notes, leveraging highly de-identified data. Validation and downstream tasks further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Feiqing Huang, Shenghan Zhang, Sara Morini Sweet, Tianxi Cai |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Encoding Recurrence into Transformers
Feiqing Huang, Kexin Lu, Yuxi Cai, Yanwen Fang, Guangjian Tian |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Compact Autoregressive NetworkabstractAutoregressive networks can achieve promising performance in many sequence modeling tasks with short-range dependence. However, when handling high-dimensional inputs and outputs, the massive amount of parameters in the network leads to expensive computational cost and low learning efficiency. The problem can be alleviated slightly by introducing one more narrow hidden layer to the network, but the sample size required to achieve a certain training error is still substantial. To address this challenge, we rearrange the weight matrices of a linear autoregressive network into a tensor form, and then make use of Tucker decomposition to represent low-rank structures. This leads to a novel compact autoregressive network, called Tucker AutoRegressive (TAR) net. Interestingly, the TAR net can be applied to sequences with long-range dependence since the dimension along the sequential order is reduced. Theoretical studies show that the TAR net improves the learning efficiency, and requires much fewer samples for model training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed compact network. Feiqing Huang, Jingyu Zhao 0001, Guangjian Tian |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory?abstractThe LSTM network was proposed to overcome the difficulty in learning long-term dependence, and has made significant advancements in applications. With its success and drawbacks in mind, this paper raises the question - do RNN and LSTM have long memory? We answer it partially by proving that RNN and LSTM do not have long memory from a statistical perspective. A new definition for long memory networks is further introduced, and it requires the model weights to decay at a polynomial rate. To verify our theory, we convert RNN and LSTM into long memory networks by making a minimal modification, and their superiority is illustrated in modeling long-term dependence of various datasets. Jingyu Zhao 0001, Feiqing Huang, Jia Lv, Yanjie Duan, Guangjian Tian |
ICML | 2 |