Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shabnam Daghaghi
dblp:248/8236
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
negative sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Tale of Two Efficient and Informative Negative Sampling Distributions · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sampling distribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Tale of Two Efficient and Informative Negative Sampling Distributions · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
softmax classifier |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Tale of Two Efficient and Informative Negative Sampling Distributions · ICML 2021 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
large-scale classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Tale of Two Efficient and Informative Negative Sampling Distributions · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
negative sampling · 1.0adaptive sampling · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Tale of Two Efficient and Informative Negative Sampling DistributionsabstractSoftmax classifiers with a very large number of classes naturally occur in many applications such as natural language processing and information retrieval. The calculation of full softmax is costly from the computational and energy perspective. There have been various sampling approaches to overcome this challenge, popularly known as negative sampling (NS). Ideally, NS should sample negative classes from a distribution that is dependent on the input data, the current parameters, and the correct positive class. Unfortunately, due to the dynamically updated parameters and data samples, there is no sampling scheme that is provably adaptive and samples the negative classes efficiently. Therefore, alternative heuristics like random sampling, static frequency-based sampling, or learning-based biased sampling, which primarily trade either the sampling cost or the adaptivity of samples per iteration are adopted. In this paper, we show two classes of distributions where the sampling scheme is truly adaptive and provably generates negative samples in near-constant time. Our implementation in C++ on CPU is significantly superior, both in terms of wall-clock time and accuracy, compared to the most optimized TensorFlow implementations of other popular negative sampling approaches on powerful NVIDIA V100 GPU. Shabnam Daghaghi, Tharun Medini, Nicholas Meisburger, Beidi Chen, Anshumali Shrivastava |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | SDM-Net: A simple and effective model for generalized zero-shot learningabstractZero-Shot Learning (ZSL) is a classification task where some classes referred to as unseen classes have no training images. Instead, we only have side information about seen and unseen classes, often in the form of semantic or descriptive attributes. Lack of training images from a set of classes restricts the use of standard classification techniques and losses, including the widespread cross-entropy loss. We introduce a novel Similarity Distribution Matching Network (SDM-Net) which is a standard fully connected neural network architecture with a non-trainable penultimate layer consisting of class attributes. The output layer of SDM-Net consists of both seen and unseen classes. To enable zero-shot learning, during training, we regularize the model such that the predicted distribution of unseen class is close in KL divergence to the distribution of similarities between the correct seen class and all the unseen classes. We evaluate the proposed model on five benchmark datasets for zero-shot learning, AwA1, AwA2, aPY, SUN, and CUB datasets. We show that, despite the simplicity, our approach achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art methods in Generalized-ZSL setting for all of these datasets. Shabnam Daghaghi, Tharun Medini, Anshumali Shrivastava |
UAI | 1 |