Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daron Anderson

dblp:248/9275 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1675-7764ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 76% Approximation and online algorithms · 20% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 4%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 56% Reinforcement learning · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization
1.222023
Lazy Lagrangians for Optimistic Learning With Budget Constraints · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2023
The Lazy Online Subgradient Algorithm is Universal on Strongly Convex Domains · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.722022
Expected Regret and Pseudo-Regret are Equivalent When the Optimal Arm is Unique · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
The Lazy Online Subgradient Algorithm is Universal on Strongly Convex Domains · NeurIPS 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.722022
Expected Regret and Pseudo-Regret are Equivalent When the Optimal Arm is Unique · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Cluster-Based Bandits: Fast Cold-Start for Recommender System New Users · SIGIR 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.612022
Expected Regret and Pseudo-Regret are Equivalent When the Optimal Arm is Unique · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.612022
Expected Regret and Pseudo-Regret are Equivalent When the Optimal Arm is Unique · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Recommender systems
cold-start recommendation
0.512021
Cluster-Based Bandits: Fast Cold-Start for Recommender System New Users · SIGIR 2021
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
0.512021
The Lazy Online Subgradient Algorithm is Universal on Strongly Convex Domains · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
subgradient method
0.512021
The Lazy Online Subgradient Algorithm is Universal on Strongly Convex Domains · NeurIPS 2021
Network management and operations
network resource management
0.212023
Lazy Lagrangians for Optimistic Learning With Budget Constraints · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.112021
Cluster-Based Bandits: Fast Cold-Start for Recommender System New Users · SIGIR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 2.1follow-the-regularized-leader · 1.3dynamic steps · 1.3stochastic optimization · 1.1online lazy gradient descent · 1.0clustering · 1.0bandit algorithms · 1.0saddle-point algorithm · 0.7saddle point algorithms · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Lazy Lagrangians for Optimistic Learning With Budget Constraints
abstract
We consider the general problem of online convex optimization with time-varying budget constraints in the presence of predictions for the next cost and constraint functions, that arises in a plethora of network resource management problems. A novel saddle-point algorithm is designed by combining a Follow-The-Regularized-Leader iteration with prediction-adaptive dynamic steps. The algorithm achieves$\mathcal O(T^{(3-\beta)/4})$regret and$\mathcal O(T^{(1+\beta)/2})$constraint violation bounds that are tunable via parameter$\beta \!\in \![1/2,1$) and have constant factors that shrink with the predictions quality, achieving eventually$\mathcal O(1)$regret for perfect predictions. Our work extends the seminal FTRL framework for this new OCO setting and outperforms the respective state-of-the-art greedy-based solutions which naturally cannot benefit from predictions, without imposing conditions on the (unknown) quality of predictions, the cost functions or the geometry of constraints, beyond convexity.
Daron Anderson, George Iosifidis, Douglas J. Leith
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1
2022 Expected Regret and Pseudo-Regret are Equivalent When the Optimal Arm is Unique
abstract
In online linear optimisation with stochastic losses it is common to bound the pseudo-regret of an algorithm rather than the expected regret. This is attributed to the expected fluctuations for i.i.d sums making expected regret bounds better than $\Omega(\sqrt T)$ impossible. In this paper we show that when there is a unique optimal action and the action set is a polytope the difference between pseudo-regret and expected regret is $o(1)$. This means that the existing upper bounds on pseudo-regret in the literature can immediately be extended to also upper bound the expected regret. Our results are independent of the algorithm used to select the actions and apply equally to the bandit and full-information settings.
Daron Anderson, Douglas J. Leith
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 The Lazy Online Subgradient Algorithm is Universal on Strongly Convex Domains
abstract
We study Online Lazy Gradient Descent for optimisation on a strongly convex domain. The algorithm is known to achieve $O(\sqrt N)$ regret against adversarial opponents; here we show it is universal in the sense that it also achieves $O(\log N)$ expected regret against i.i.d opponents. This improves upon the more complex meta-algorithm of Huang et al \cite{FTLBall} that only gets $O(\sqrt {N \log N})$ and $ O(\log N)$ bounds. In addition we show that, unlike for the simplex, order bounds for pseudo-regret and expected regret are equivalent for strongly convex domains.
Daron Anderson, Douglas J. Leith
NeurIPS1
2021 Cluster-Based Bandits: Fast Cold-Start for Recommender System New Users
abstract
How to quickly and reliably learn the preferences of new users remains a key challenge in the design of recommender systems. In this paper we introduce a new type of online learning algorithm, cluster-based bandits, to address this challenge. This exploits the fact that users can often be grouped into clusters based on the similarity of their preferences, and this allows accelerated learning of new user preferences since the task becomes one of identifying which cluster a user belongs to and typically there are far fewer clusters than there are items to be rated. Clustering by itself is not enough however. Intra-cluster variability between users can be thought of as adding noise to user ratings. Deterministic methods such as decision-trees perform poorly in the presence of such noise. We identify so-called distinguisher items that are particularly informative for deciding which cluster a new user belongs to despite the rating noise. Using these items the cluster-based bandit algorithm is able to efficiently adapt to user responses and rapidly learn the correct cluster to assign to a new user.
Sulthana Shams, Daron Anderson, Douglas J. Leith
SIGIR2