Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bowen Jing 0002
dblp:248/9307-2
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
10since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-author · 10 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Generative modeling · 72% 3D vision · 12% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
9 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.6 | 4 | 2024 | Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories · NeurIPS 2024 DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking · ICLR 2023 Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
2.3 | 3 | 2024 | Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design · ICML 2024 Harmonic Self-Conditioned Flow Matching for joint Multi-Ligand Docking and Binding Site Design · ICML 2024 AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular docking |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier Transforms · ICLR 2024 DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking · ICLR 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories · NeurIPS 2024 Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier Transforms · ICLR 2024 Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons · ICLR 2021 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories · NeurIPS 2024 AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
3d generative model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
equivariant graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier Transforms · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
sequence generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Harmonic Self-Conditioned Flow Matching for joint Multi-Ligand Docking and Binding Site Design · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
scoring function |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier Transforms · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
molecular conformation generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › efficient diffusion model
subspace diffusion model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Subspace Diffusion Generative Models · ECCV (23) 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular conformation generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons · ICLR 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons · ICLR 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons · ICLR 2021 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
DNA sequence design |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
molecular structure |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer Generation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 3.9statistical modeling · 2.6generative modeling · 1.5flow matching · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5fast fourier transform · 1.5equivariant graph neural network · 1.5distillation · 1.5cross-correlation · 1.5classifier-free guidance · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D EllipsoidsabstractWe develop ProtComposer to generate protein structures conditioned on spatial protein layouts that are specified via a set of 3D ellipsoids capturing substructure shapes and semantics. At inference time, we condition on ellipsoids that are hand-constructed, extracted from existing proteins, or from a statistical model, with each option unlocking new capabilities. Hand-specifying ellipsoids enables users to control the location, size, orientation, secondary structure, and approximate shape of protein substructures. Conditioning on ellipsoids of existing proteins enables redesigning their substructure's connectivity or editing substructure properties. By conditioning on novel and diverse ellipsoid layouts from a simple statistical model, we improve protein generation with expanded Pareto frontiers between designability, novelty, and diversity. Further, this enables sampling designable proteins with a helix-fraction that matches PDB proteins, unlike existing generative models that commonly oversample conceptually simple helix bundles. Code is available at https://github.com/NVlabs/protcomposer. Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing 0002, Tomas Geffner, Jason Yim, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Arash Vahdat, Karsten Kreis |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier TransformsabstractMolecular docking is critical to structure-based virtual screening, yet the throughput of such workflows is limited by the expensive optimization of scoring functions involved in most docking algorithms. We explore how machine learning can accelerate this process by learning a scoring function with a functional form that allows for more rapid optimization. Specifically, we define the scoring function to be the cross-correlation of multi-channel ligand and protein scalar fields parameterized by equivariant graph neural networks, enabling rapid optimization over rigid-body degrees of freedom with fast Fourier transforms. The runtime of our approach can be amortized at several levels of abstraction, and is particularly favorable for virtual screening settings with a common binding pocket. We benchmark our scoring functions on two simplified docking-related tasks: decoy pose scoring and rigid conformer docking. Our method attains similar but faster performance on crystal structures compared to the widely-used Vina and Gnina scoring functions, and is more robust on computationally predicted structures. Code is available at https://github.com/bjing2016/scalar-fields. Bowen Jing 0002, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Bonnie Berger |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein EnsemblesabstractThe biological functions of proteins often depend on dynamic structural ensembles. In this work, we develop a flow-based generative modeling approach for learning and sampling the conformational landscapes of proteins. We repurpose highly accurate single-state predictors such as AlphaFold and ESMFold and fine-tune them under a custom flow matching framework to obtain sequence-conditioned generative models of protein structure called AlphaFlow and ESMFlow. When trained and evaluated on the PDB, our method provides a superior combination of precision and diversity compared to AlphaFold with MSA subsampling. When further trained on ensembles from all-atom MD, our method accurately captures conformational flexibility, positional distributions, and higher-order ensemble observables for unseen proteins. Moreover, our method can diversify a static PDB structure with faster wall-clock convergence to certain equilibrium properties than replicate MD trajectories, demonstrating its potential as a proxy for expensive physics-based simulations. Code is available at https://github.com/bjing2016/alphaflow. Bowen Jing 0002, Bonnie Berger, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Harmonic Self-Conditioned Flow Matching for joint Multi-Ligand Docking and Binding Site DesignabstractA significant amount of protein function requires binding small molecules, including enzymatic catalysis. As such, designing binding pockets for small molecules has several impactful applications ranging from drug synthesis to energy storage. Towards this goal, we first develop HarmonicFlow, an improved generative process over 3D protein-ligand binding structures based on our self-conditioned flow matching objective. FlowSite extends this flow model to jointly generate a protein pocket’s discrete residue types and the molecule’s binding 3D structure. We show that HarmonicFlow improves upon state-of-the-art generative processes for docking in simplicity, generality, and average sample quality in pocket-level docking. Enabled by this structure modeling, FlowSite designs binding sites substantially better than baseline approaches. Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing 0002, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Dirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence DesignabstractDiscrete diffusion or flow models could enable faster and more controllable sequence generation than autoregressive models. We show that naive linear flow matching on the simplex is insufficient toward this goal since it suffers from discontinuities in the training target and further pathologies. To overcome this, we develop Dirichlet flow matching on the simplex based on mixtures of Dirichlet distributions as probability paths. In this framework, we derive a connection between the mixtures' scores and the flow's vector field that allows for classifier and classifier-free guidance. Further, we provide distilled Dirichlet flow matching, which enables one-step sequence generation with minimal performance hits, resulting in $O(L)$ speedups compared to autoregressive models. On complex DNA sequence generation tasks, we demonstrate superior performance compared to all baselines in distributional metrics and in achieving desired design targets for generated sequences. Finally, we show that our classifier-free guidance approach improves unconditional generation and is effective for generating DNA that satisfies design targets. Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing 0002, Chenyu Wang 0003, Gabriele Corso, Bonnie Berger, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics TrajectoriesabstractMolecular dynamics (MD) is a powerful technique for studying microscopic phenomena, but its computational cost has driven significant interest in the development of deep learning-based surrogate models. We introduce generative modeling of molecular trajectories as a paradigm for learning flexible multi-task surrogate models of MD from data. By conditioning on appropriately chosen frames of the trajectory, we show such generative models can be adapted to diverse tasks such as forward simulation, transition path sampling, and trajectory upsampling. By alternatively conditioning on part of the molecular system and inpainting the rest, we also demonstrate the first steps towards dynamics-conditioned molecular design. We validate the full set of these capabilities on tetrapeptide simulations and show preliminary results on scaling to protein monomers. Altogether, our work illustrates how generative modeling can unlock value from MD data towards diverse downstream tasks that are not straightforward to address with existing methods or even MD itself. Code is available at https://github.com/bjing2016/mdgen. Bowen Jing 0002, Hannes Stärk, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Bonnie Berger |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking
Gabriele Corso, Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing 0002, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Subspace Diffusion Generative Models
Bowen Jing 0002, Gabriele Corso, Renato Berlinghieri, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ECCV (23) | 1 |
| 2022 | Torsional Diffusion for Molecular Conformer GenerationabstractMolecular conformer generation is a fundamental task in computational chemistry. Several machine learning approaches have been developed, but none have outperformed state-of-the-art cheminformatics methods. We propose torsional diffusion, a novel diffusion framework that operates on the space of torsion angles via a diffusion process on the hypertorus and an extrinsic-to-intrinsic score model. On a standard benchmark of drug-like molecules, torsional diffusion generates superior conformer ensembles compared to machine learning and cheminformatics methods in terms of both RMSD and chemical properties, and is orders of magnitude faster than previous diffusion-based models. Moreover, our model provides exact likelihoods, which we employ to build the first generalizable Boltzmann generator. Code is available at https://github.com/gcorso/torsional-diffusion. Bowen Jing 0002, Gabriele Corso, Jeffrey Chang, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons
Bowen Jing 0002, Stephan Eismann, Patricia Suriana, Raphael J. L. Townshend, Ron O. Dror |
ICLR | 1 |