Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marcel Schweiker
dblp:248/9522
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing › physiological signal analysis
heart rate variability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Personal thermal perception models using skin temperatures and HR/HRV features: comparison of smartwatch and professional measurement devices · UbiComp 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.4feature importance analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Personal thermal perception models using skin temperatures and HR/HRV features: comparison of smartwatch and professional measurement devicesabstractIn order to detect a person's individual momentary thermal sensation and comfort, an increased number of models are developed that involve physiological data, especially skin temperatures and features based on the heart activity. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of Machine Learning (ML) models which include physiological data based on two data sources: (1) a smartwatch and (2) a portable chest belt device. Further, we investigate the difference between thermal sensation and comfort votes and propose a new combined ground truth label. Data were collected in lab-like studies in a single-bed hotel room. Our study focuses on the detection of cold-induced thermal discomfort by varying the room air temperature between 24 °C and 20 °C. Results show that ML based approaches lead to accuracies up to 83.1% when using a chest belt device. Using a smartwatch, accuracies drop down to 79.8%. Our investigation shows that even though Heart Rate (HR) based features improve the prediction accuracy, the highest feature importances have distal skin temperature features. Fanny Kobiela, Rongrong Shen, Marcel Schweiker, Robert Dürichen |
UbiComp | 3 |