Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrejs Zujevs

dblp:249/0129 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0009-0000-0565-874XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 64% 3D vision · 36%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry
0.512021
An Event-based Vision Dataset for Visual Navigation Tasks in Agricultural Environments · ICRA 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
event-based vision
0.412020
Clock-based time sync hronization for an event-based camera dataset acquisition platform * · ICRA 2020
Distributed systems
clock synchronization
0.412020
Clock-based time sync hronization for an event-based camera dataset acquisition platform * · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.112021
An Event-based Vision Dataset for Visual Navigation Tasks in Agricultural Environments · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.112020
Clock-based time sync hronization for an event-based camera dataset acquisition platform * · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-sensor synchronization · 0.9PIC32 microcontroller implementation · 0.9event-based vision · 0.5dynamic vision sensor · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Visual Navigation Datasets for Event-based Vision: 2014-2021
Andrejs Zujevs, Agris Nikitenko
ICINCO1
2021 An Event-based Vision Dataset for Visual Navigation Tasks in Agricultural Environments
abstract
a new generation of computer vision, namely event-based or neuromorphic vision, provides a new paradigm for capturing visual data and the way such data is processed. Due to a highly novel type of visual sensors used in event-based vision, only a few datasets aimed at visual navigation tasks are publicly available.In this paper, we present and describe the first event-based vision dataset intended to cover visual navigation tasks for mobile robots navigating in different types of agricultural environment. The dataset might open new opportunities for the evaluation of existing and creation of new event-based visual navigation methods for use in agricultural scenes that contain a lot of vegetation, animals, and patterned objects.The new dataset was created using our own custom-designed Sensor Bundle, which was installed on a mobile robot platform. During data acquisition sessions, the platform was manually controlled. The Sensor Bundle consists of a dynamic vision sensor, a LIDAR, an RGB-D camera, and environmental sensors.In total, 21 data sequences in 12 different scenarios for the autumn season are publicly available. Each data sequence is accompanied by a video demonstrating its content and a detailed description, including known issues. The new dataset is mostly designed for Visual Odometry tasks; however, it also includes loop-closures for applying event-based visual SLAM methods.
Andrejs Zujevs, Mihails Pudzs, Vitalijs Osadcuks, Arturs Ardavs, Maris Galauskis, Janis Grundspenkis
ICRA1
2020 Clock-based time sync hronization for an event-based camera dataset acquisition platform *
abstract
The Dynamic Visual Sensor is considered to be a next-generation vision sensor. Since event-based vision is in its early stage of development, a small number of datasets has been created during the last decade. Dataset creation is motivated by the need for real data from one or many sensors. Temporal accuracy of data in such datasets is crucially important since the events have high temporal resolution measured in microseconds and, during an algorithm evaluation task, such type of visual data is usually fused with data from other types of sensors. The main aim of our research is to achieve the most accurate possible time synchronization between an event camera, LIDAR, and ambient environment sensors during a session of data acquisition. All the mentioned sensors as well as a stereo and a monocular camera were installed on a mobile robotic platform. In this work, a time synchronization architecture and algorithm are proposed for time synchronization with an implementation example on a PIC32 microcontroller. The overall time synchronization approach is scalable for other sensors where there is a need for accurate time synchronization between many nodes. The evaluation results of the proposed solution are reported and discussed in the paper.
Vitalijs Osadcuks, Mihails Pudzs, Andrejs Zujevs, Aldis Pecka, Arturs Ardavs
ICRA3
2019 A Method for Static and Dynamic Interval Detection within the IMU Calibration Procedure
abstract
An Inertial Measuring Unit (IMU) is used for measuring linear accelerations and angular velocities in 3D/2D space. IMU devices are usually designed as micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), which are produced in small form factor and are widely used in robotics, mobile phones and drones. Depending on the quality of the device, they can be divided into low-cost and high-cost IMUs. The main difference between them is the accuracy of measurements and IMUs mechanical alignment on the printed circuit board. The high-cost IMUs are well calibrated and have a relatively small error and noise level for different kinds of parameters. In contrast, the low-cost IMUs have a larger error component, where body frame axes are non-orthogonal for both the accelerometer and gyroscope due to weak factory calibration, high noise and high sensitivity dependence from the temperature, misalignment of body frame due to packaging and assembly processes. This paper provides a new method for the IMU static and dynamic interval detection within the IMU calibration procedure, which is designed by other authors for the case of IMU calibration without any external equipment. This procedure uses a sequence of alternating static and dynamic intervals for accelerometer calibration and then gyroscope calibration. The accuracy of the IMU calibration procedure depends strongly on how precisely static and dynamic intervals have been detected. Otherwise, the calibration results are unsuitable. The new method for static and dynamic interval detection provides more robust and less noisy results, requires a significantly smaller number of operations and is easy to implement. The paper provides comparative results for both methods and refers to the source code for the new method.
Andrejs Zujevs, Valters Vecins, Aleksandrs Korsunovs
ICINCO (1)1