Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seth Isaacson
dblp:249/2178
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-2063-5045ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 60% Robot navigation and mapping · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
safe motion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › reachability analysis
reachable set computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling
scene representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with Spheres · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trajectory optimization · 0.9normalized reformulation · 0.9neural network-based reachable set representation · 0.9gaussian splatting · 0.9conformal prediction · 0.9collision probability bounding · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance with SpheresabstractSafe motion planning algorithms are necessary for deploying autonomous robots in unstructured environments to prevent harm to humans and avoid damage to nearby objects. Generating these motion plans in real-time is also important to ensure that the robot can adapt to sudden changes in its environment. Many trajectory optimization methods introduce heuristics that balance safety and real-time performance, potentially increasing the risk of the robot colliding with its environment. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing Conformalized Reachable Sets for Obstacle Avoidance With Spheres (CROWS). CROWS is a novel real-time, receding-horizon trajectory planner that generates probablistically-safe motion plans. Offline, CROWS learns a novel neural network-based representation of a sphere-based reachable set that overapproximates the swept volume of the robot's motion. CROWS then uses conformal prediction to compute a confidence bound that provides a probabilistic safety guarantee on the learned reachable set. At runtime, CROWS performs trajectory optimization to select a trajectory that is probabilstically-guaranteed to be collision-free. We demonstrate that CROWS outperforms a variety of state-of-the-art methods in solving challenging motion planning tasks in cluttered environments while remaining collision-free. Code and video demonstrations can be found at https://roahmlab.github.io/crows/. Yongseok Kwon, Jonathan B. Michaux, Seth Isaacson, Bohao Zhang, Matthew Ejakov, Katherine A. Skinner, Ramanarayan Vasudevan |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2025 | Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian SplatabstractNeural Radiance Fields and Gaussian Splatting have recently transformed computer vision by enabling photo-realistic representations of complex scenes. However, they have seen limited application in real-world robotics tasks such as trajectory optimization. This is due to the difficulty in reasoning about collisions in radiance models and the computational complexity associated with operating in dense models. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing SPLANNING, a risk-aware trajectory optimizer operating in a Gaussian Splatting model. This paper first derives a method to rigorously upper-bound the probability of collision between a robot and a radiance field. Then, this paper introduces a normalized reformulation of Gaussian Splatting that enables efficient computation of this collision bound. Finally, this paper presents a method to optimize trajectories that avoid collisions in a Gaussian Splat. Experiments show that SPLANNING outperforms state-of-the-art methods in generating collision-free trajectories in cluttered environments. The proposed system is also tested on a real-world robot manipulator. A project page is available athttps://roahmlab.github.io/splanning. Jonathan B. Michaux, Seth Isaacson, Challen Enninful Adu, Adam Li, Rahul Kashyap Swayampakula, Parker Ewen, Sean Rice, Katherine A. Skinner, Ramanarayan Vasudevan |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 2 |