Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Carpenter
dblp:249/2309
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-9570-9018ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 4 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
5 papers |
Cellular and mobile networks · 67% Network measurement and analytics · 11% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 8% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cellular and mobile networks
5g |
3.5 | 5 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoE · SIGCOMM 2024 Roaming across the European Union in the 5G Era: Performance, Challenges, and Opportunities · INFOCOM 2024 |
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
handover |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Vivisecting mobility management in 5G cellular networks · SIGCOMM 2022 A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones · WWW 2020 |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › intelligent transportation systems
remote driving |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Cellular and mobile networks › low-latency communication
ultra-reliable low-latency communication |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Network measurement and analytics
mobile network measurement |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Roaming across the European Union in the 5G Era: Performance, Challenges, and Opportunities · INFOCOM 2024 A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones · WWW 2020 |
Cellular and mobile networks › 5g
5g performance measurement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoE · SIGCOMM 2024 |
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Roaming across the European Union in the 5G Era: Performance, Challenges, and Opportunities · INFOCOM 2024 |
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
roaming |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Roaming across the European Union in the 5G Era: Performance, Challenges, and Opportunities · INFOCOM 2024 |
Cellular and mobile networks
mobility management |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Vivisecting mobility management in 5G cellular networks · SIGCOMM 2022 |
Cellular and mobile networks
millimeter-wave communication |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones · WWW 2020 |
Network measurement and analytics
network performance measurement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones · WWW 2020 |
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
real-time streaming |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
WebRTC |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
measurement study · 2.1qoe analysis · 1.0end-to-end measurement · 1.0cross-layer measurement · 1.0cross-country comparison · 0.8performance prediction · 0.4field measurement · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet?abstractRemote driving, orteleoperating AutonomousVehicles (AVs), is a key application that emerging 5G networks aim to support. In this paper, we conduct a systematic feasibility study of AV teleoperation over commercial 5G networks from bothcross-layerandend-to-end (E2E)perspectives. Given the critical importance oftimely delivery of sensor data, such as camera and LiDAR data, for AV teleoperation, we focus in particular on the performance of uplink sensor data delivery. We analyze the impact of Physical Layer (PHY layer) 5G radio network factors, including channel conditions, radio resource allocation, and Handovers (HOs), on E2E latency performance. We also examine the impact of 5G networks on the performance of upper-layer protocols and E2E application Quality-of-Experience (QoE) of the adaptation mechanisms used for real-time sensor data delivery, such as Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). Our study reveals the challenges posed by today’s 5G networks and the limitations of existing sensor data streaming mechanisms. The insights gained will help inform the co-design of future-generation wireless networks, edge cloud systems, and applications to overcome the low-latency barriers in AV teleoperation. Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Jason Carpenter, Rushikesh Zende, Sree Ganesh Lalitaditya Divakarla, Nitin Varyani, Faaiq Bilal, Steven Sleder, Nanditha Naik, Duncan Joly, Eman Ramadan, Ajay Kumar Gurumadaiah, Zhi-Li Zhang |
IEEE Trans. Netw. | 2 |
| 2024 | Roaming across the European Union in the 5G Era: Performance, Challenges, and OpportunitiesabstractRoaming provides users with voice and data connectivity when traveling abroad. This is particularly the case in Europe where the "Roam like Home" policy established by the European Union in 2017 has made roaming affordable. Nonetheless, due to various policies employed by operators, roaming can incur considerable performance penalties as shown in past studies of 3G/4G networks. As 5G provides significantly higher bandwidth, how does roaming affect user-perceived performance? We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first comprehensive and comparative measurement study of commercial 5G in four European countries.Our measurement study is unique in the way it makes it possible to link key 5G mid-band channels and configuration parameters ("policies") used by various operators in these countries with their effect on the observed 5G performance from the network (in particular, the physical and MAC layers) and applications perspectives. Our measurement study not only portrays users’ observed quality of experience when roaming, but also provides guidance to optimize the network configuration and to users and application developers in choosing mobile operators. Moreover, our contribution provides the research community with the largest cross-country roaming 5G dataset to stimulate further research. Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Claudio Fiandrino, Eman Ramadan, Jason Carpenter, Yiling Tan, Feng Qian 0001, Jörg Widmer, Zhi-Li Zhang |
INFOCOM | 4 |
| 2024 | Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoEabstract5G in mid-bands has become the dominant deployment of choice in the world. We present - to the best of our knowledge - the first comprehensive and comparative cross-country measurement study of commercial mid-band 5G deployments in Europe and the U.S., filling a gap in the existing 5G measurement studies. We unveil the key 5G mid-band channels and configuration parameters used by various operators in these countries, and identify the major factors that impact the observed 5G performance both from the network (physical layer) perspective as well as the application perspective. We characterize and compare 5G mid-band throughput and latency performance by dissecting the 5G configurations, lower-layer parameters as well as deployment settings. By cross-correlating 5G parameters with the application decision process, we demonstrate how 5G parameters affect application QoE metrics and suggest a simple approach for QoE enhancement. Our study sheds light on how to better configure and optimize 5G mid-band networks, and provides guidance to users and application developers on operator choices and application QoE tuning. We released the datasets and artifacts at https://github.com/SIGCOMM24-5GinMidBands/artifacts. Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Claudio Fiandrino, Eman Ramadan, Jason Carpenter, Lilian Coelho de Freitas, Faaiq Bilal, Wei Ye 0009, Jörg Widmer, Feng Qian 0001, Zhi-Li Zhang |
SIGCOMM | 4 |
| 2024 | DeTorrent: An Adversarial Padding-only Traffic Analysis DefenseabstractWhile anonymity networks like Tor aim to protect the privacy of their users, they are vulnerable to traffic analysis attacks such as Website Fingerprinting (WF) and Flow Correlation (FC). Recent implementations of WF and FC attacks, such as Tik-Tok and DeepCoFFEA, have shown that the attacks can be effectively carried out, threatening user privacy. Consequently, there is a need for effective traffic analysis defense. There are a variety of existing defenses, but most are either ineffective, incur high latency and bandwidth overhead, or require additional infrastructure. As a result, we aim to design a traffic analysis defense that is efficient and highly resistant to both WF and FC attacks. We propose DeTorrent, which uses competing neural networks to generate and evaluate traffic analysis defenses that insert 'dummy' traffic into real traffic flows. DeTorrent operates with moderate overhead and without delaying traffic. In a closed-world WF setting, it reduces an attacker's accuracy by 61.5%, a reduction 10.5% better than the next-best padding-only defense. Against the state-of-the-art FC attacker, DeTorrent reduces the true positive rate for a .00001 false positive rate to about .12, which is less than half that of the next-best defense. We also demonstrate DeTorrent's practicality by deploying it alongside the Tor network and find that it maintains its performance when applied to live traffic. James K. Holland, Jason Carpenter, Se Eun Oh, Nicholas Hopper |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 2 |
| 2022 | Vivisecting mobility management in 5G cellular networksabstractWith 5G's support for diverse radio bands and different deployment modes, e.g., standalone (SA) vs. non-standalone (NSA), mobility management - especially the handover process - becomes far more complex. Measurement studies have shown that frequent handovers cause wild fluctuations in 5G throughput, and worst, service outages. Through a cross-country (6,200 km+) driving trip, we conduct in-depth measurements to study the current 5G mobility management practices adopted by three major U.S. carriers. Using this rich dataset, we carry out a systematic analysis to uncover the handover mechanisms employed by 5G carriers, and compare them along several dimensions such as (4G vs. 5G) radio technologies, radio (low-, mid- & high-)bands, and deployment (SA vs. NSA) modes. We further quantify the impact of mobility on application performance, power consumption, and signaling overheads. We identify key challenges facing today's NSA 5G deployments which result in unnecessary handovers and reduced coverage. Finally, we design a holistic handover prediction system Prognos and demonstrate its ability to improve QoE for two 5G applications 16K panoramic VoD and realtime volumetric video streaming. We have released the artifacts of our study at https://github.com/SIGCOMM22-5GMobility/artifact. Ahmad Hassan 0004, Arvind Narayanan, Anlan Zhang, Wei Ye 0009, Ruiyang Zhu, Shuowei Jin, Jason Carpenter, Z. Morley Mao, Feng Qian 0001, Zhi-Li Zhang |
SIGCOMM | 7 |
| 2020 | A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on SmartphonesabstractWe conduct to our knowledge a first measurement study of commercial 5G performance on smartphones by closely examining 5G networks of three carriers (two mmWave carriers, one mid-band carrier) in three U.S. cities. We conduct extensive field tests on 5G performance in diverse urban environments. We systematically analyze the handoff mechanisms in 5G and their impact on network performance. We explore the feasibility of using location and possibly other environmental information to predict the network performance. We also study the app performance (web browsing and HTTP download) over 5G. Our study consumes more than 15 TB of cellular data. Conducted when 5G just made its debut, it provides a “baseline” for studying how 5G performance evolves, and identifies key research directions on improving 5G users’ experience in a cross-layer manner. We have released the data collected from our study (referred to as 5Gophers) at https://fivegophers.umn.edu/www20. Arvind Narayanan, Eman Ramadan, Jason Carpenter, Qingxu Liu, Yu Liu 0096, Feng Qian 0001, Zhi-Li Zhang |
WWW | 3 |