EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marin Bilos
dblp:249/5420
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Generative modeling · 45% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% Deep learning architectures and training · 12% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | Variational Schrödinger Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2023 Modeling Temporal Data as Continuous Functions with Stochastic Process Diffusion · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process |
1.9 | 4 | 2023 | Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point Processes · NeurIPS 2023 Fast and Flexible Temporal Point Processes with Triangular Maps · NeurIPS 2020 Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processes · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Scalable Normalizing Flows for Permutation Invariant Densities · ICML 2021 Fast and Flexible Temporal Point Processes with Triangular Maps · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion bridge
diffusion schrödinger bridge |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Schrödinger Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Modeling Temporal Data as Continuous Functions with Stochastic Process Diffusion · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Modeling Temporal Data as Continuous Functions with Stochastic Process Diffusion · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Normalizing Flows for Permutation Invariant Densities · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
continuous-time generative model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
predictive uncertainty |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Uncertainty on Asynchronous Time Event Prediction · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Uncertainty on Asynchronous Time Event Prediction · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.3 | 2 | 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2021 Uncertainty on Asynchronous Time Event Prediction · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Schrödinger Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Schrödinger Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Fast and Flexible Temporal Point Processes with Triangular Maps · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Uncertainty on Asynchronous Time Event Prediction · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 0.9variational inference · 0.8stochastic approximation · 0.8schrödinger bridge · 0.8score matching · 0.7denoising diffusion probabilistic model · 0.7denoising diffusion · 0.7autoregressive neural network · 0.7neural ordinary differential equation · 0.5continuous normalizing flow · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Variational Schrödinger Diffusion ModelsabstractSchrödinger bridge (SB) has emerged as the go-to method for optimizing transportation plans in diffusion models. However, SB requires estimating the intractable forward score functions, inevitably resulting in the (costly) implicit training loss based on simulated trajectories. To improve the scalability while preserving efficient transportation plans, we leverage variational inference to linearize the forward score functions (variational scores) of SB and restore *simulation-free* properties in training backward scores. We propose the variational Schrödinger diffusion model (VSDM), where the forward process is a multivariate diffusion and the variational scores are adaptively optimized for efficient transport. Theoretically, we use stochastic approximation to prove the convergence of the variational scores and show the convergence of the adaptively generated samples based on the optimal variational scores. Empirically, we test the algorithm in simulated examples and observe that VSDM is efficient in generations of anisotropic shapes and yields straighter sample trajectories compared to the single-variate diffusion. We also verify the scalability of the algorithm in real-world data and achieve competitive unconditional generation performance in CIFAR10 and conditional generation in time series modeling. Notably, VSDM no longer depends on warm-up initializations required by SB. Wei Deng 0002, Weijian Luo, Yixin Tan, Marin Bilos, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Ricky T. Q. Chen |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Modeling Temporal Data as Continuous Functions with Stochastic Process DiffusionabstractTemporal data such as time series can be viewed as discretized measurements of the underlying function. To build a generative model for such data we have to model the stochastic process that governs it. We propose a solution by defining the denoising diffusion model in the function space which also allows us to naturally handle irregularly-sampled observations. The forward process gradually adds noise to functions, preserving their continuity, while the learned reverse process removes the noise and returns functions as new samples. To this end, we define suitable noise sources and introduce novel denoising and score-matching models. We show how our method can be used for multivariate probabilistic forecasting and imputation, and how our model can be interpreted as a neural process. Marin Bilos, Kashif Rasul, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Add and Thin: Diffusion for Temporal Point ProcessesabstractAutoregressive neural networks within the temporal point process (TPP) framework have become the standard for modeling continuous-time event data. Even though these models can expressively capture event sequences in a one-step-ahead fashion, they are inherently limited for long-term forecasting applications due to the accumulation of errors caused by their sequential nature. To overcome these limitations, we derive ADD-THIN, a principled probabilistic denoising diffusion model for TPPs that operates on entire event sequences. Unlike existing diffusion approaches, ADD-THIN naturally handles data with discrete and continuous components. In experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, our model matches the state-of-the-art TPP models in density estimation and strongly outperforms them in forecasting. David Lüdke, Marin Bilos, Oleksandr Shchur, Marten Lienen, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Scalable Normalizing Flows for Permutation Invariant DensitiesabstractModeling sets is an important problem in machine learning since this type of data can be found in many domains. A promising approach defines a family of permutation invariant densities with continuous normalizing flows. This allows us to maximize the likelihood directly and sample new realizations with ease. In this work, we demonstrate how calculating the trace, a crucial step in this method, raises issues that occur both during training and inference, limiting its practicality. We propose an alternative way of defining permutation equivariant transformations that give closed form trace. This leads not only to improvements while training, but also to better final performance. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on point processes and general set modeling. Marin Bilos, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEsabstractNeural ordinary differential equations describe how values change in time. This is the reason why they gained importance in modeling sequential data, especially when the observations are made at irregular intervals. In this paper we propose an alternative by directly modeling the solution curves - the flow of an ODE - with a neural network. This immediately eliminates the need for expensive numerical solvers while still maintaining the modeling capability of neural ODEs. We propose several flow architectures suitable for different applications by establishing precise conditions on when a function defines a valid flow. Apart from computational efficiency, we also provide empirical evidence of favorable generalization performance via applications in time series modeling, forecasting, and density estimation. Marin Bilos, Johanna Sommer, Syama Sundar Rangapuram, Tim Januschowski, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processes
Oleksandr Shchur, Marin Bilos, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Fast and Flexible Temporal Point Processes with Triangular MapsabstractTemporal point process (TPP) models combined with recurrent neural networks provide a powerful framework for modeling continuous-time event data. While such models are flexible, they are inherently sequential and therefore cannot benefit from the parallelism of modern hardware. By exploiting the recent developments in the field of normalizing flows, we design TriTPP - a new class of non-recurrent TPP models, where both sampling and likelihood computation can be done in parallel. TriTPP matches the flexibility of RNN-based methods but permits several orders of magnitude faster sampling. This enables us to use the new model for variational inference in continuous-time discrete-state systems. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed framework on synthetic and real-world datasets. Oleksandr Shchur, Nicholas Gao, Marin Bilos, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Towards linking social media profiles with user's WiFi preferred network list
Ante Dagelic, Mario Cagalj, Toni Perkovic, Marin Bilos |
Ad Hoc Networks | 4 |
| 2019 | Uncertainty on Asynchronous Time Event PredictionabstractAsynchronous event sequences are the basis of many applications throughout different industries. In this work, we tackle the task of predicting the next event (given a history), and how this prediction changes with the passage of time. Since at some time points (e.g. predictions far into the future) we might not be able to predict anything with confidence, capturing uncertainty in the predictions is crucial. We present two new architectures, WGP-LN and FD-Dir, modelling the evolution of the distribution on the probability simplex with time-dependent logistic normal and Dirichlet distributions. In both cases, the combination of RNNs with either Gaussian process or function decomposition allows to express rich temporal evolution of the distribution parameters, and naturally captures uncertainty. Experiments on class prediction, time prediction and anomaly detection demonstrate the high performances of our models on various datasets compared to other approaches. Bertrand Charpentier, Marin Bilos, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 2 |