Genome data from cancer patients represents relationships between the presence of a gene mutation and cancer occurrence in a patient. Different types of cancer in human are thought to be caused by combinations of two to nine gene mutations. Identifying these combinations through traditional exhaustive search requires the amount of computation that scales exponentially with the combination size and in most cases is intractable even for cutting-edge supercomputers. We propose a parameter-free heuristic approach that leverages the intrinsic topology of gene-patient mutations to identify carcinogenic combinations. The biological relevance of the identified combinations is measured by using them to predict the presence of tumor in previously unseen samples. The resulting classifiers for 16 cancer types perform on par with exhaustive search results, and score the average of 80.1% sensitivity and 91.6% specificity for the best choice of hit range per cancer type. Our approach is able to find higher-hit carcinogenic combinations targeting which would take years of computations using exhaustive search.

GPU memory corruption and in particular double-bit errors (DBEs) remain one of the least understood aspects of HPC system reliability. Albeit rare, their occurrences always lead to job termination and can potentially cost thousands of node-hours, either from wasted computations or as the overhead from regular checkpointing needed to minimize the losses. As supercomputers and their components simultaneously grow in scale, density, failure rates, and environmental footprint, the efficiency of HPC operations becomes both an imperative and a challenge.

The rise of machine learning (ML) applications and their use of mixed precision to perform interesting science are driving forces behind AI for science on HPC. The convergence of ML and HPC with mixed precision offers the possibility of transformational changes in computational science. The HPL-AI benchmark is designed to measure the performance of mixed precision arithmetic as opposed to the HPL benchmark which measures double precision performance. Pushing the limits of systems at extreme scale is nontrivial -little public literature explores optimization of mixed precision computations at this scale. In this work, we demonstrate how to scale up the HPL-AI benchmark on the pre-exascale Summit and exascale Frontier systems at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) with a cross-platform design. We present the implementation, performance results, and a guideline of optimization strategies employed for delivering portable performance on both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs at extreme scale.

As we approach the exascale computing era, the focused understanding of power consumption and its overall constraint on HPC architectures and applications are becoming increasingly paramount. Summit, located at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), is one of the fastest and largest pre-exascale platforms in operation today. This paper provides a first-order examination and analysis of power consumption at the component-level, node-level, and system-level, from all 4,626 Summit compute nodes, each with over 100 metrics at 1Hz frequency over the entire year of 2020. We also investigate the power characteristics and energy efficiency of over 840k Summit jobs and 250k GPU failure logs for further operational insights. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic analysis of power data of HPC system at this scale.