Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rohit Suvarna

dblp:249/8284 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-9960-2432ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 91% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification
0.812024
Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.812024
Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
simulation-based verification
0.812024
Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification · DAC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prioritized experience replay · 0.8deep deterministic policy gradient · 0.8bayesian optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Advanced Reinforcement Learning Algorithms to Optimize Design Verification
abstract
Given the increasing complexity of integrated circuits, the utilization of machine learning in simulation-based hardware design verification (DV) has become crucial to ensure comprehensive coverage of hard-to-hit states. Our paper proposes a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm combined with prioritized experience replay (PER) to determine the stimulus settings that result in the highest average FIFO depth in a modified exclusive shared invalid (MESI) cache controller architecture. This architecture includes four FIFOs, each corresponding to a distinct CPU. Through extensive experimentation, DDPG coupled with PER (DDPG-PER) proves to be more effective than DDPG with uniform experience replay in enhancing average FIFO depth and coverage within the DV process. Furthermore, our proposed DDPG-PER framework significantly increases the occurrence of higher FIFO depths, thereby addressing the challenges associated with reaching hard-to-hit states in DV. The proposed DDPG-PER and DDPG algorithms also demonstrate a larger average FIFO depth over four CPUs, requiring considerably less execution time than Bayesian Optimization (BO).
Zahra Aref, Rohit Suvarna, Bill Hughes, Sandeep Srinivasan, Narayan B. Mandayam
DAC2