Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Corrado Pezzato

dblp:249/8368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1835-9578ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 33% Robot manipulation · 33% Reinforcement learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.712023
Active Inference and Behavior Trees for Reactive Action Planning and Execution in Robotics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
reactive planning
0.712023
Active Inference and Behavior Trees for Reactive Action Planning and Execution in Robotics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
runtime adaptation
0.712023
Active Inference and Behavior Trees for Reactive Action Planning and Execution in Robotics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

free energy minimization · 0.7behavior trees · 0.7active inference · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Active Inference and Behavior Trees for Reactive Action Planning and Execution in Robotics
abstract
In this article, we propose a hybrid combination of active inference and behavior trees (BTs) for reactive action planning and execution in dynamic environments, showing how robotic tasks can be formulated as a free-energy minimization problem. The proposed approach allows handling partially observable initial states and improves the robustness of classical BTs against unexpected contingencies while at the same time reducing the number of nodes in a tree. In this work, we specify the nominal behavior offline, through BTs. However, in contrast to previous approaches, we introduce a new type of leaf node to specify the desired state to be achieved rather than an action to execute. The decision of which action to execute to reach the desired state is performed online through active inference. This results in continual online planning and hierarchical deliberation. By doing so, an agent can follow a predefined offline plan while still keeping the ability to locally adapt and take autonomous decisions at runtime, respecting safety constraints. We provide proof of convergence and robustness analysis, and we validate our method in two different mobile manipulators performing similar tasks, both in a simulated and real retail environment. The results showed improved runtime adaptability with a fraction of the hand-coded nodes compared to classical BTs.
Corrado Pezzato, Carlos Hernández Corbato, Stefan Bonhof, Martijn Wisse
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2022 Unbiased Active Inference for Classical Control
abstract
Active inference is a mathematical framework that originated in computational neuroscience. Recently, it has been demonstrated as a promising approach for constructing goal-driven behavior in robotics. Specifically, the active inference controller (AIC) has been successful on several continuous control and state-estimation tasks. Despite its relative success, some established design choices lead to a number of practical limitations for robot control. These include having a biased estimate of the state, and only an implicit model of control actions. In this paper, we highlight these limitations and propose an extended version of the unbiased active inference controller (u-AIC). The u-AIC maintains all the compelling benefits of the AIC and removes its limitations. Simulation results on a 2-DOF arm and experiments on a real 7-DOF manipulator show the improved performance of the u-AIC with respect to the standard AIC. The code can be found at https://github.com/cpezzato/unbiasedaic.
Mohamed Baioumy, Corrado Pezzato, Riccardo M. G. Ferrari, Nick Hawes
IROS2