Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiaoben Bao

dblp:249/9113 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 40% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
explainable fact-checking
0.612022
LOREN: Logic-Regularized Reasoning for Interpretable Fact Verification · AAAI 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.612022
LOREN: Logic-Regularized Reasoning for Interpretable Fact Verification · AAAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.612022
LOREN: Logic-Regularized Reasoning for Interpretable Fact Verification · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.612022
Harvesting More Answer Spans from Paragraph beyond Annotation · WSDM 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
span prediction
0.612022
Harvesting More Answer Spans from Paragraph beyond Annotation · WSDM 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

three-valued logic · 0.6positive-unlabeled learning · 0.6pointer network · 0.6neural network · 0.6latent variable model · 0.6graph neural network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 LOREN: Logic-Regularized Reasoning for Interpretable Fact Verification
abstract
Given a natural language statement, how to verify its veracity against a large-scale textual knowledge source like Wikipedia? Most existing neural models make predictions without giving clues about which part of a false claim goes wrong. In this paper, we propose LOREN, an approach for interpretable fact verification. We decompose the verification of the whole claim at phrase-level, where the veracity of the phrases serves as explanations and can be aggregated into the final verdict according to logical rules. The key insight of LOREN is to represent claim phrase veracity as three-valued latent variables, which are regularized by aggregation logical rules. The final claim verification is based on all latent variables. Thus, LOREN enjoys the additional benefit of interpretability --- it is easy to explain how it reaches certain results with claim phrase veracity. Experiments on a public fact verification benchmark show that LOREN is competitive against previous approaches while enjoying the merit of faithful and accurate interpretability. The resources of LOREN are available at: https://github.com/jiangjiechen/LOREN.
Jiangjie Chen, Qiaoben Bao, Changzhi Sun, Xinbo Zhang, Jiaze Chen, Hao Zhou 0012, Yanghua Xiao, Lei Li 0005
AAAI2
2022 Knowing What I Don't Know: A Generation Assisted Rejection Framework in Knowledge Base Question Answering
Junyang Huang, Xuantao Lu, Jiaqing Liang, Qiaoben Bao, Yanghua Xiao, Bang Liu 0003, Yunwen Chen
DASFAA (3)4
2022 Harvesting More Answer Spans from Paragraph beyond Annotation
abstract
AutomaticA nswer spanE xtraction (AE) focuses on identifying key information from paragraphs that can be asked. It has been used to facilitate downstream question generation tasks or data augmentation for question answering. Current work of AE heavily relies on the annotated answer spans fromM achineR eadingC omprehension (MRC) datasets. However, these methods suffer from the partial annotation problem due to the annotation protocols of MRC tasks. To tackle this problem, we propose \mymethod, a S tructured Co ntext graph network with P ositive -unlabeled learning. \mymethod first represents the paragraph by constructing a graph with both syntactic and semantic edges, then adopts a unified pointer network for answer span identification. \mymethod narrows the discrenpency between AE and MRC by formulating AE as aP ositive-\textitu nlabeled (PU) learning problem, thus recovering more answer spans from paragraphs. To evaluate newly extracted spans without annotation, we also present an automatic metric from the perspective of question answering and text summarization, which correlates well with human judgments. Comprehensive experiments on both AE and downstream tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework. Our code is available at \urlhttps://github.com/iambabao/SCOPE.
Qiaoben Bao, Jiangjie Chen, Linfang Liu, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao
WSDM1
2019 Charge Prediction with Legal Attention
Qiaoben Bao, Hongying Zan, Peiyuan Gong, Yanghua Xiao
NLPCC (1)1