Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mihir Prabhudesai
dblp:249/9214
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
3D vision · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 24% Generative modeling · 23% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 Test-time Adaptation with Slot-Centric Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 2 | 2023 | Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier · ICCV 2023 Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
scene decomposition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation with Slot-Centric Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling › scene representation
3d scene representation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CoCoNets: Continuous Contrastive 3D Scene Representations · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CoCoNets: Continuous Contrastive 3D Scene Representations · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › prototype-based classification
prototypical network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling 3D Prototypical Networks for Few-Shot Concept Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Embodied Language Grounding With 3D Visual Feature Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
language grounding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Embodied Language Grounding With 3D Visual Feature Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | CoCoNets: Continuous Contrastive 3D Scene Representations · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling 3D Prototypical Networks for Few-Shot Concept Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | CoCoNets: Continuous Contrastive 3D Scene Representations · CVPR 2021 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
object rearrangement |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Embodied Language Grounding With 3D Visual Feature Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised reconstruction · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7generative feedback · 0.7diffusion model · 0.7diffusion classifier · 0.7cross-view synthesis · 0.7conditional density estimation · 0.7implicit function · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.53d feature grid · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diffusion Beats Autoregressive in Data-Constrained SettingsabstractAutoregressive (AR) models have long dominated the landscape of large language models, driving progress across a wide range of tasks. Recently, diffusion-based language models have emerged as a promising alternative, though their advantages over AR models remain underexplored. In this paper, we systematically study masked diffusion models in data-constrained settings—where training involves repeated passes over limited data—and find that they significantly outperform AR models when compute is abundant but data is scarce. Diffusion models make better use of repeated data, achieving lower validation loss and superior downstream performance. We find new scaling laws for diffusion models and derive a closed-form expression for the critical compute threshold at which diffusion begins to outperform AR. Finally, we explain why diffusion models excel in this regime: their randomized masking objective implicitly trains over a rich distribution of token orderings, acting as an implicit data augmentation that AR’s fixed left-to-right factorization lacks. Our results suggest that when data, not compute, is the bottleneck, diffusion models offer a compelling alternative to the standard AR paradigm. Our code is available at: https://diffusion-scaling.github.io Mihir Prabhudesai, Mengning Wu, Katerina Fragkiadaki, Deepak Pathak |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot ClassifierabstractThe recent wave of large-scale text-to-image diffusion models has dramatically increased our text-based image generation abilities. These models can generate realistic images for a staggering variety of prompts and exhibit impressive compositional generalization abilities. Almost all use cases thus far have solely focused on sampling; however, diffusion models can also provide conditional density estimates, which are useful for tasks beyond image generation. In this paper, we show that the density estimates from large-scale text-to-image diffusion models like Stable Diffusion can be leveraged to perform zero-shot classification without any additional training. Our generative approach to classification, which we call Diffusion Classifier, attains strong results on a variety of benchmarks and outperforms alternative methods of extracting knowledge from diffusion models. Although a gap remains between generative and discriminative approaches on zero-shot recognition tasks, our diffusion-based approach has stronger multimodal compositional reasoning abilities than competing discriminative approaches. Finally, we use Diffusion Classifier to extract standard classifiers from class-conditional diffusion models trained on ImageNet. These models approach the performance of SOTA discriminative classifiers and exhibit strong "effective robustness" to distribution shift. Overall, our results are a step toward using generative over discriminative models for downstream tasks. Results and visualizations on our website: diffusion-classifier.github.io/ Alexander C. Li, Mihir Prabhudesai, Shivam Duggal, Ellis Brown, Deepak Pathak |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2023 | Test-time Adaptation with Slot-Centric ModelsabstractCurrent visual detectors, though impressive within their training distribution, often fail to parse out-of-distribution scenes into their constituent entities. Recent test-time adaptation methods use auxiliary self-supervised losses to adapt the network parameters to each test example independently and have shown promising results towards generalization outside the training distribution for the task of image classification. In our work, we find evidence that these losses are insufficient for the task of scene decomposition, without also considering architectural inductive biases. Recent slot-centric generative models attempt to decompose scenes into entities in a self-supervised manner by reconstructing pixels. Drawing upon these two lines of work, we propose Slot-TTA, a semi-supervised slot-centric scene decomposition model that at test time is adapted per scene through gradient descent on reconstruction or cross-view synthesis objectives. We evaluate Slot-TTA across multiple input modalities, images or 3D point clouds, and show substantial out-of-distribution performance improvements against state-of-the-art supervised feed-forward detectors, and alternative test-time adaptation methods. Project Webpage: http://slot-tta.github.io/ Mihir Prabhudesai, Anirudh Goyal, Sujoy Paul, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Gaurav Aggarwal, Thomas Kipf, Deepak Pathak, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback
Mihir Prabhudesai, Tsung-Wei Ke, Alexander C. Li, Deepak Pathak, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | CoCoNets: Continuous Contrastive 3D Scene RepresentationsabstractThis paper explores self-supervised learning of amodal 3D feature representations from RGB and RGB-D posed images and videos, agnostic to object and scene semantic content, and evaluates the resulting scene representations in the downstream tasks of visual correspondence, object tracking, and object detection. The model infers a latent 3D representation of the scene in the form of 3D feature points, where each continuous world 3D point is mapped to its corresponding feature vector. The model is trained for contrastive view prediction by rendering 3D feature clouds in queried viewpoints and matching against the 3D feature point cloud predicted from the query view. Notably, the representation can be queried for any 3D location, even if it is not visible from the input view. Our model brings together three powerful ideas of recent exciting research work: 3D feature grids as a neural bottleneck for view prediction, implicit functions for handling resolution limitations of 3D grids, and contrastive learning for unsupervised training of feature representations. We show the resulting 3D visual feature representations effectively scale across objects and scenes, imagine information occluded or missing from the input viewpoints, track objects over time, align semantically related objects in 3D, and improve 3D object detection. We outperform many existing state-of-the-art methods for 3D feature learning and view prediction, which are either limited by 3D grid spatial resolution, do not attempt to build amodal 3D representations, or do not handle combinatorial scene variability due to their non-convolutional bottlenecks. Shamit Lal, Mihir Prabhudesai, Ishita Mediratta, Adam W. Harley, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Disentangling 3D Prototypical Networks for Few-Shot Concept Learning
Mihir Prabhudesai, Shamit Lal, Darshan Patil, Hsiao-Yu Fish Tung, Adam W. Harley, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Embodied Language Grounding With 3D Visual Feature RepresentationsabstractWe propose associating language utterances to 3D visual abstractions of the scene they describe. The 3D visual abstractions are encoded as 3-dimensional visual feature maps. We infer these 3D visual scene feature maps from RGB images of the scene via view prediction: when the generated 3D scene feature map is neurally projected from a camera viewpoint, it should match the corresponding RGB image. We present generative models that condition on the dependency tree of an utterance and generate a corresponding visual 3D feature map as well as reason about its plausibility, and detector models that condition on both the dependency tree of an utterance and a related image and localize the object referents in the 3D feature map inferred from the image. Our model outperforms models of language and vision that associate language with 2D CNN activations or 2D images by a large margin in a variety of tasks, such as, classifying plausibility of utterances, detecting referential expressions, and supplying rewards for trajectory optimization of object placement policies from language instructions. We perform numerous ablations and show the improved performance of our detectors is due to its better generalization across camera viewpoints and lack of object interferences in the inferred 3D feature space, and the improved performance of our generators is due to their ability to spatially reason about objects and their configurations in 3D when mapping from language to scenes. Mihir Prabhudesai, Hsiao-Yu Fish Tung, Syed Ashar Javed, Maximilian Sieb, Adam W. Harley, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
CVPR | 1 |