Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wilson Wu

dblp:249/9251 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 79% Algorithms and data structures · 21%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Towards a Unified and Verified Understanding of Group-Operation Networks · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
Towards a Unified and Verified Understanding of Group-Operation Networks · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
neighbor-joining
0.912025
Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.912025
Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic inference
0.812024
Ultrafast classical phylogenetic method beats large protein language models on variant effect prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
variant effect prediction
0.812024
Ultrafast classical phylogenetic method beats large protein language models on variant effect prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
lineage tracing
0.312025
Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining · RECOMB 2025
Algorithms and data structures › polynomial-time algorithms
near-linear time algorithms
0.212024
Ultrafast classical phylogenetic method beats large protein language models on variant effect prediction · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proof of model performance · 1.7equivariance analysis · 1.7site-specific rate matrix · 1.5probabilistic modeling · 1.5cherry reconstruction · 1.5neighbor-joining · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards a Unified and Verified Understanding of Group-Operation Networks
abstract
A recent line of work in mechanistic interpretability has focused on reverse-engineering the computation performed by neural networks trained on the binary operation of finite groups. We investigate the internals of one-hidden-layer neural networks trained on this task, revealing previously unidentified structure and producing a more complete description of such models in a step towards unifying the explanations of previous works (Chughtai et al., 2023; Stander et al., 2024). Notably, these models approximate equivariance in each input argument. We verify that our explanation applies to a large fraction of networks trained on this task by translating it into a compact proof of model performance, a quantitative evaluation of the extent to which we faithfully and concisely explain model internals. In the main text, we focus on the symmetric group S5. For models trained on this group, our explanation yields a guarantee of model accuracy that runs 3x faster than brute force and gives a >=95% accuracy bound for 45% of the models we trained. We were unable to obtain nontrivial non-vacuous accuracy bounds using only explanations from previous works.
Wilson Wu, Louis Jaburi, Jacob Drori, Jason Gross
ICLR1
2025 Tree Reconstruction Guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 Lineage Tracing Data Using Neighbor-Joining
Sebastian Prillo, Kevin An, Wilson Wu, Ivan Kristanto, Matthew G. Jones, Yun S. Song, Nir Yosef
RECOMB3
2024 Ultrafast classical phylogenetic method beats large protein language models on variant effect prediction
abstract
Amino acid substitution rate matrices are fundamental to statistical phylogenetics and evolutionary biology. Estimating them typically requires reconstructed trees for massive amounts of aligned proteins, which poses a major computational bottleneck. In this paper, we develop a near-linear time method to estimate these rate matrices from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) alone, thereby speeding up computation by orders of magnitude. Our method relies on a near-linear time cherry reconstruction algorithm which we call FastCherries and it can be easily applied to MSAs with millions of sequences. On both simulated and real data, we demonstrate the speed and accuracy of our method as applied to the classical model of protein evolution. By leveraging the unprecedented scalability of our method, we develop a new, rich phylogenetic model called SiteRM, which can estimate a general site-specific rate matrix for each column of an MSA. Remarkably, in variant effect prediction for both clinical and deep mutational scanning data in ProteinGym, we show that despite being an independent-sites model, our SiteRM model outperforms large protein language models that learn complex residue-residue interactions between different sites. We attribute our increased performance to conceptual advances in our probabilistic treatment of evolutionary data and our ability to handle extremely large MSAs. We anticipate that our work will have a lasting impact across both statistical phylogenetics and computational variant effect prediction. FastCherries and SiteRM are implemented in the CherryML package https://github.com/songlab-cal/CherryML.
Sebastian Prillo, Wilson Wu, Yun Song
NeurIPS2