EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Matak
dblp:249/9331
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 62% 3D vision · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Continuous 3D Reconstructions for Geometrically Aware Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Continuous 3D Reconstructions for Geometrically Aware Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
learning-based 3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Continuous 3D Reconstructions for Geometrically Aware Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
grasp success classifier · 0.4deep learning · 0.4continuous grasp optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Learning Continuous 3D Reconstructions for Geometrically Aware GraspingabstractDeep learning has enabled remarkable improvements in grasp synthesis for previously unseen objects from partial object views. However, existing approaches lack the ability to explicitly reason about the full 3D geometry of the object when selecting a grasp, relying on indirect geometric reasoning derived when learning grasp success networks. This abandons explicit geometric reasoning, such as avoiding undesired robot object collisions. We propose to utilize a novel, learned 3D reconstruction to enable geometric awareness in a grasping system. We leverage the structure of the reconstruction network to learn a grasp success classifier which serves as the objective function for a continuous grasp optimization. We additionally explicitly constrain the optimization to avoid undesired contact, directly using the reconstruction. We examine the role of geometry in grasping both in the training of grasp metrics and through 96 robot grasping trials. Our results can be found on https://sites.google.com/view/reconstruction-grasp/. Mark Van der Merwe, Qingkai Lu, Balakumar Sundaralingam, Martin Matak, Tucker Hermans |
ICRA | 4 |