Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle S. Smith

dblp:25/11014 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.212016
SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › somatic mutation analysis
somatic mutation detection
0.212016
SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › next-generation sequencing data analysis
exome sequencing analysis
0.112016
SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
high-throughput sequencing
0.112016
SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical variant detection · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples
abstract
MOTIVATION: Somatic variant calling typically requires paired tumor-normal tissue samples. Yet, paired normal tissues are not always available in clinical settings or for archival samples. RESULTS: We present SomVarIUS, a computational method for detecting somatic variants using high throughput sequencing data from unpaired tissue samples. We evaluate the performance of the method using genomic data from synthetic and real tumor samples. SomVarIUS identifies somatic variants in exome-seq data of ∼150 × coverage with at least 67.7% precision and 64.6% recall rates, when compared with paired-tissue somatic variant calls in real tumor samples. We demonstrate the utility of SomVarIUS by identifying somatic mutations in formalin-fixed samples, and tracking clonal dynamics of oncogenic mutations in targeted deep sequencing data from pre- and post-treatment leukemia samples. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SomVarIUS is written in Python 2.7 and available at http://www.sjdlab.org/resources/ CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Kyle S. Smith, Vinod Kumar Yadav, Shanshan Pei, Daniel A. Pollyea, Craig T. Jordan, Subhajyoti De
Bioinform.1
2009 A Neural Computational Model of Incentive Salience
abstract
Incentive salience is a motivational property with 'magnet-like' qualities. When attributed to reward-predicting stimuli (cues), incentive salience triggers a pulse of 'wanting' and an individual is pulled toward the cues and reward. A key computational question is how incentive salience is generated during a cue re-encounter, which combines both learning and the state of limbic brain mechanisms. Learning processes, such as temporal-difference models, provide one way for stimuli to acquire cached predictive values of rewards. However, empirical data show that subsequent incentive values are also modulated on the fly by dynamic fluctuation in physiological states, altering cached values in ways requiring additional motivation mechanisms. Dynamic modulation of incentive salience for a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS or cue) occurs during certain states, without necessarily requiring (re)learning about the cue. In some cases, dynamic modulation of cue value occurs during states that are quite novel, never having been experienced before, and even prior to experience of the associated unconditioned reward in the new state. Such cases can include novel drug-induced mesolimbic activation and addictive incentive-sensitization, as well as natural appetite states such as salt appetite. Dynamic enhancement specifically raises the incentive salience of an appropriate CS, without necessarily changing that of other CSs. Here we suggest a new computational model that modulates incentive salience by integrating changing physiological states with prior learning. We support the model with behavioral and neurobiological data from empirical tests that demonstrate dynamic elevations in cue-triggered motivation (involving natural salt appetite, and drug-induced intoxication and sensitization). Our data call for a dynamic model of incentive salience, such as presented here. Computational models can adequately capture fluctuations in cue-triggered 'wanting' only by incorporating modulation of previously learned values by natural appetite and addiction-related states.
Kent C. Berridge, Amy J. Tindell, Kyle S. Smith, J. Wayne Aldridge
PLoS Comput. Biol.4