Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kamil Kaminski

dblp:25/2082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
homology detection
0.712023
pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein sequence analysis
0.712023
pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › homology detection
remote homology detection
0.712023
pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence feature extraction
sequence embedding
0.212023
pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protein language model · 0.7local alignment · 0.7embedding comparison · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 pLAST - a tool for rapid comparison and classification of bacterial plasmid sequences
abstract
MOTIVATION: The increasing number of fully sequenced bacterial plasmids being annotated and catalogued has prompted the development of computational tools for comparing and classifying them. Existing approaches typically compare full-length DNA sequences (e.g. Mash, BLASTn, and ANI-based methods) or translated open reading frames (ORFs) (e.g. DIAMOND), with plasmid-level scores obtained by aggregating ORF-to-ORF similarities; however, they are either restricted to closely related plasmids or become computationally demanding in large-scale analyses. RESULTS: We describe pLAST (plasmid Language Analysis and Search Tool), a plasmid-search tool built using word2vec representations of protein-family content informed by local genomic context. Benchmarks indicate that pLAST outperforms nucleotide-based methods and performs comparably to DIAMOND in identifying functionally similar plasmids and compared with the widely used Mash, it achieves 26% and 24% improvements in detecting shared mating-pair formation system type and relaxase type, respectively. This performance scales to database searches across hundreds of thousands of sequences, as demonstrated using the precomputed PlasmidScope collection of ∼750 000 plasmids. Beyond global similarity, pLAST also returns per-ORF plasmid-plasmid alignments, enabling detection of shared functional modules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: pLAST is freely accessible as a web server at https://plast.lbs.cent.uw.edu.pl/ or https://plast.lbs.biol.uw.edu.pl/ and available as a Python module along with a precomputed database at https://github.com/labstructbioinf/pLAST for customized analysis.
Kamil Krakowski, Malgorzata Orlowska, Kamil Kaminski, Dariusz Bartosik, Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz
Bioinform.3
2023 pLM-BLAST: distant homology detection based on direct comparison of sequence representations from protein language models
abstract
MOTIVATION: The detection of homology through sequence comparison is a typical first step in the study of protein function and evolution. In this work, we explore the applicability of protein language models to this task. RESULTS: We introduce pLM-BLAST, a tool inspired by BLAST, that detects distant homology by comparing single-sequence representations (embeddings) derived from a protein language model, ProtT5. Our benchmarks reveal that pLM-BLAST maintains a level of accuracy on par with HHsearch for both highly similar sequences (with >50% identity) and markedly divergent sequences (with <30% identity), while being significantly faster. Additionally, pLM-BLAST stands out among other embedding-based tools due to its ability to compute local alignments. We show that these local alignments, produced by pLM-BLAST, often connect highly divergent proteins, thereby highlighting its potential to uncover previously undiscovered homologous relationships and improve protein annotation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: pLM-BLAST is accessible via the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit as a web server for searching precomputed databases (https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/plmblast). It is also available as a standalone tool for building custom databases and performing batch searches (https://github.com/labstructbioinf/pLM-BLAST).
Kamil Kaminski, Jan Ludwiczak, Kamil Pawlicki, Vikram Alva, Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz
Bioinform.1
2022 Rossmann-toolbox: a deep learning-based protocol for the prediction and design of cofactor specificity in Rossmann fold proteins
abstract
The Rossmann fold enzymes are involved in essential biochemical pathways such as nucleotide and amino acid metabolism. Their functioning relies on interaction with cofactors, small nucleoside-based compounds specifically recognized by a conserved βαβ motif shared by all Rossmann fold proteins. While Rossmann methyltransferases recognize only a single cofactor type, the S-adenosylmethionine, the oxidoreductases, depending on the family, bind nicotinamide (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) or flavin-based (flavin adenine dinucleotide) cofactors. In this study, we showed that despite its short length, the βαβ motif unambiguously defines the specificity towards the cofactor. Following this observation, we trained two complementary deep learning models for the prediction of the cofactor specificity based on the sequence and structural features of the βαβ motif. A benchmark on two independent test sets, one containing βαβ motifs bearing no resemblance to those of the training set, and the other comprising 38 experimentally confirmed cases of rational design of the cofactor specificity, revealed the nearly perfect performance of the two methods. The Rossmann-toolbox protocols can be accessed via the webserver at https://lbs.cent.uw.edu.pl/rossmann-toolbox and are available as a Python package at https://github.com/labstructbioinf/rossmann-toolbox.
Kamil Kaminski, Jan Ludwiczak, Maciej Jasinski, Adriana Bukala, Rafal Madaj, Krzysztof Szczepaniak, Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz
Briefings Bioinform.1