MOTIVATION: Biological differences between classes are reflected in transcriptional changes which in turn affect the levels by which essential genes are individually expressed and collectively connected. The purpose of this communication is to introduce an analytical procedure to simultaneously identify genes that are differentially expressed (DE) as well as differentially connected (DC) in two or more classes of interest. RESULTS: Our procedure is based on a two-step approach: First, mixed-model equations are applied to obtain the normalized expression levels of each gene in each class treatment. These normalized expressions form the basis to compute a measure of (possible) DE as well as the correlation structure existing among genes. Second, a two-component mixture of bi-variate distributions is fitted to identify the component that encapsulates those genes that are DE and/or DC. We demonstrate our approach using three distinct datasets including a human systemic inflammation oligonucleotide data; a spotted cDNA data dealing with bovine in vitro adipogenesis and SAGE database on cancerous and normal tissue samples.

MOTIVATION: Clusters of genes encoding proteins with related functions, or in the same regulatory network, often exhibit expression patterns that are correlated over a large number of conditions. Protein associations and gene regulatory networks can be modelled from expression data. We address the question of which of several normalization methods is optimal prior to computing the correlation of the expression profiles between every pair of genes. RESULTS: We use gene expression data from five experiments with a total of 78 hybridizations and 23 diverse conditions. Nine methods of data normalization are explored based on all possible combinations of normalization techniques according to between and within gene and experiment variation. We compare the resulting empirical distribution of gene x gene correlations with the expectations and apply cross-validation to test the performance of each method in predicting accurate functional annotation. We conclude that normalization methods based on mixed-model equations are optimal.