EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaosong Yuan
dblp:25/2886
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
4as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5748-5174ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 72% Vision and language · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
2.9 | 3 | 2026 | SeaRAG: Reducing Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Statement-Entity Adaptive Ranking · WWW 2026 ART: Attention Replacement Technique to Improve Factuality in LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 Shallow Focus, Deep Fixes: Enhancing Shallow Layers Vision Attention Sinks to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
attention intervention |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ART: Attention Replacement Technique to Improve Factuality in LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability › factuality
factuality improvement |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ART: Attention Replacement Technique to Improve Factuality in LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SeaRAG: Reducing Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Statement-Entity Adaptive Ranking · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SeaRAG: Reducing Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Statement-Entity Adaptive Ranking · WWW 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shallow Focus, Deep Fixes: Enhancing Shallow Layers Vision Attention Sinks to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A Soft Prompt Optimization Approach · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompt tuning
soft prompt optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A Soft Prompt Optimization Approach · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
chain-of-thought prompting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Reasoning Fails Where Step Flow Breaks · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | SeaRAG: Reducing Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Statement-Entity Adaptive Ranking · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Shallow Focus, Deep Fixes: Enhancing Shallow Layers Vision Attention Sinks to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
complex reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A Soft Prompt Optimization Approach · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0training-free intervention · 1.0reasoning chain analysis · 1.0local attention · 1.0attention replacement · 1.0rotary position encoding · 0.9prompt tuning · 0.9parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9manhattan distance attention · 0.9attention sink analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ART: Attention Replacement Technique to Improve Factuality in LLMsabstractHallucination in large language models (LLMs) continues to be a significant issue, particularly in tasks like question answering, where models often generate plausible yet incorrect or irrelevant information.Although various methods have been proposed to mitigate hallucinations, the relationship between attention patterns and hallucinations has not been fully explored.In this paper, we analyze the distribution of attention scores across each layer and attention head of LLMs, revealing a common and intriguing phenomenon: Shallow layers of LLMs primarily rely on uniform attention patterns, where the model distributes its attention evenly across the entire sequence.This uniform attention pattern can lead to hallucinations, as the model fails to focus on the most relevant information.To mitigate this issue, we propose a trainingfree method called Attention Replacement Technique (ART), which replaces these uniform attention patterns in the shallow layers with local attention patterns.This change directs the model to focus more on the relevant contexts, thus reducing hallucinations.Through extensive experiments, ART demonstrates significant reductions in hallucinations across multiple LLM architectures, proving its effectiveness and generalizability without requiring fine-tuning or additional training data. Ziqin Luo, Yihao Quan, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Xiaosong Yuan, Chen Shen 0003 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2026 | Reasoning Fails Where Step Flow BreaksabstractXiaoyu Xu, Yulan Pan, Xiaosong Yuan, Zhihong Shen, Minghao Su, Yuanhao Su, Xiaofeng Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Yulan Pan, Xiaosong Yuan, Zhihong Shen, Minghao Su, Yuanhao Su, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2026 | SeaRAG: Reducing Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Statement-Entity Adaptive Ranking
Xiaosong Yuan, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Yijia Zhang 0003, Ying Wang 0009 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2025 | Shallow Focus, Deep Fixes: Enhancing Shallow Layers Vision Attention Sinks to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMsabstractXiaofeng Zhang, Yihao Quan, Chen Shen, Chaochen Gu, Xiaosong Yuan, Shaotian Yan, Jiawei Cao, Hao Cheng, Kaijie Wu, Jieping Ye. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Yihao Quan, Chen Shen 0003, Chaochen Gu, Xiaosong Yuan, Shaotian Yan, Hao Cheng 0004, Kaijie Wu 0002, Jieping Ye |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2025 | Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A Soft Prompt Optimization ApproachabstractPrompt Tuning (PT) has emerged as a promising Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) approach by appending trainable continuous prompt vectors to the input, maintaining competitive performance with significantly fewer trainable parameters. While PT has shown effectiveness in enhancing task performance, particularly for classification tasks, its application to complex reasoning tasks has been largely overlooked. Our investigation reveals that PT provides limited improvement and may even degrade performance in reasoning tasks. This phenomenon suggests that soft prompts can positively impact certain instances while negatively affecting others, particularly during the latter stages of reasoning.
To address these challenges, we propose a novel method called Dynamic Prompt Corruption (DPC), which seeks to optimize the use of soft prompts in reasoning tasks. DPC dynamically adjusts the influence of soft prompts based on their impact on the reasoning process. Specifically, it involves two key components: Dynamic Trigger and Dynamic Corruption. Dynamic Trigger measures the influence of soft prompts, determining whether their impact is beneficial or detrimental. Dynamic Corruption mitigates the negative effects of soft prompts by selectively masking key tokens that interfere with the reasoning process.
We validate our approach through extensive experiments on various large language models (LLMs) and reasoning tasks, including GSM8K, MATH, and AQuA. The results demonstrate that Dynamic Prompt Corruption consistently improves the performance of LLMs, achieving 4\%-8\% accuracy gains compared to standard prompt tuning. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our approach and its potential to enhance complex reasoning in LLMs. Sinan Fan, Liang Xie 0003, Chen Shen 0003, Ge Teng, Xiaosong Yuan, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Chenxi Huang 0004, Wenxiao Wang 0001, Xiaofei He 0001, Jieping Ye |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2025 | MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsabstractHallucinations pose a significant challenge in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs), with misalignment between multimodal features identified as a key contributing factor. This paper reveals the negative impact of the long-term decay in Rotary Position Encoding (RoPE), used for positional modeling in LVLMs, on multimodal alignment. Concretely, under long-term decay, instruction tokens exhibit uneven perception of image tokens located at different positions within the two-dimensional space: prioritizing image tokens from the bottom-right region since in the one-dimensional sequence, these tokens are positionally closer to the instruction tokens. This biased perception leads to insufficient image-instruction interaction and suboptimal multimodal alignment. We refer to this phenomenon as ''image alignment bias.'' To enhance instruction's perception of image tokens at different spatial locations, we propose MCA-LLaVA, based on Manhattan distance, which extends the long-term decay to a two-dimensional, multi-directional spatial decay. MCA-LLaVA integrates the one-dimensional sequence order and two-dimensional spatial position of image tokens for positional modeling, mitigating hallucinations by alleviating image alignment bias. Experimental results of MCA-LLaVA across various hallucination and general benchmarks demonstrate its effectiveness and generality. The code can be accessed in https://github.com/ErikZ719/MCA-LLaVA. Qiyan Zhao, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Yun Xing 0001, Xiaosong Yuan, Sinan Fan, Xuhang Chen 0002, Dahan Wang, Xu-Yao Zhang |
ACM Multimedia | 5 |
| 2025 | From Redundancy to Relevance: Information Flow in LVLMs Across Reasoning TasksabstractXiaofeng Zhang, Yihao Quan, Chen Shen, Xiaosong Yuan, Shaotian Yan, Liang Xie, Wenxiao Wang, Chaochen Gu, Hao Tang, Jieping Ye. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Yihao Quan, Chen Shen 0003, Xiaosong Yuan, Shaotian Yan, Liang Xie 0003, Wenxiao Wang 0001, Chaochen Gu, Hao Tang 0005, Jieping Ye |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 4 |
| 2025 | DRIVE: An adjustable parallel architecture based on evidence awareness for fake news detection
Mou Cong, Lu Liu 0013, Xiaosong Yuan, Tao Peng 0003 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 5 |
| 2024 | Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought PromptingabstractZero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting emerges as a simple and effective strategy for enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in real-world reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, the efficacy of a singular, task-level prompt uniformly applied across the whole of instances is inherently limited since one prompt cannot be a good partner for all, a more appropriate approach should consider the interaction between the prompt and each instance meticulously. This work introduces an instance-adaptive prompting algorithm as an alternative zero-shot CoT reasoning scheme by adaptively differentiating good and bad prompts. Concretely, we first employ analysis on LLMs through the lens of information flow to detect the mechanism under zero-shot CoT reasoning, in which we discover that information flows from question to prompt and question to rationale jointly influence the reasoning results most. We notice that a better zero-shot CoT reasoning needs the prompt to obtain semantic information from the question then the rationale aggregates sufficient information from the question directly and via the prompt indirectly. On the contrary, lacking any of those would probably lead to a bad one. Stem from that, we further propose an instance-adaptive prompting strategy (IAP) for zero-shot CoT reasoning. Experiments conducted with LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3, and Qwen on math, logic, and commonsense reasoning tasks (e.g., GSM8K, MMLU, Causal Judgement) obtain consistent improvement, demonstrating that the instance-adaptive zero-shot CoT prompting performs better than other task-level methods with some curated prompts or sophisticated procedures, showing the significance of our findings in the zero-shot CoT reasoning mechanism. Xiaosong Yuan, Chen Shen 0003, Shaotian Yan, Xiaofeng Zhang 0006, Liang Xie 0003, Wenxiao Wang 0001, Renchu Guan, Ying Wang 0009, Jieping Ye |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | TC-GAT: Graph Attention Network for Temporal Causality DiscoveryabstractThe present study explores the intricacies of causal relationship extraction, a vital component in the pursuit of causality knowledge. Causality is frequently intertwined with temporal elements, as the progression from cause to effect is not instantaneous but rather ensconced in a temporal dimension. Thus, the extraction of temporal causality holds paramount significance in the field. In light of this, we propose a method for extracting causality from the text that integrates both temporal and causal relations, with a particular focus on the time aspect. To this end, we first compile a dataset that encompasses temporal relationships. Subsequently, we present a novel model, TC-GAT, which employs a graph attention mechanism to assign weights to the temporal relationships and leverages a causal knowledge graph to determine the adjacency matrix. Additionally, we implement an equilibrium mechanism to regulate the interplay between temporal and causal relations. Our experiments demonstrate that our proposed method significantly surpasses baseline models in the task of causality extraction. Xiaosong Yuan, Wanli Zuo, Yijia Zhang 0003 |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2023 | The Causal Strength Bank: A New Benchmark for Causal Strength Classification
Xiaosong Yuan, Renchu Guan, Wanli Zuo, Yijia Zhang 0003 |
PAKDD (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Dynamic item feature modeling for rating prediction in recommender systems
Xianglin Zuo, Shining Liang, Xiaosong Yuan |
Neurocomputing | 3 |
| 2005 | Computing hierarchical curve-skeletons of 3D objects
Nicu D. Cornea, Deborah Silver, Xiaosong Yuan, Balasubramanian Raman |
Vis. Comput. | 3 |