Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Malcolm McIlhagga

dblp:25/3637 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Operating systems · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems
adaptive applications
0.011998
Towards a Design Methodology for Adaptive Applications · MobiCom 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011998
Towards a Design Methodology for Adaptive Applications · MobiCom 1998
Design research and methods › user participation
user involvement in design
0.011998
Towards a Design Methodology for Adaptive Applications · MobiCom 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

abstract architecture modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Towards a Design Methodology for Adaptive Applications
abstract
We describe an abstract architecture of adaptive applications, and indicate where we believe crucial design decisions must be made.We illustrate the use of the abstract model in the design and implementation ofan image proxy, and describe the studies required in determining the appropriate design points.In particular, even though adaptation to resource constraints is generally considered a systems probleu the adaptation is visible to the user in changes in utility, and so the user must be involved in designing the application.Finally, we discuss the politics that creep in when dwigners change the semantics of applications. Adapting to Constraints: Choices in Application Design An adaptive application is one in which the application changes its behaviour according to the perceived constraints in Ille envitnnnlent, so fl,rto nlaintain the semantics of the application for the lise~If we take the above definition as our starting point, then we 133 -----..-. . ... . . . .
Malcolm McIlhagga, Ann Light, Ian Wakeman
MobiCom1
1996 A Comparison of Optimization Techniques for Integrated Manufacturing Planning and Scheduling
Malcolm McIlhagga, Phil Husbands, Robert Ives
PPSN1
1996 A Comparison of Search Techniques on a Wing-Box Optimisation Problem
Malcolm McIlhagga, Phil Husbands, Robert Ives
PPSN1