Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Josh Creter

dblp:25/608 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 87% Web and social media mining · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.011997
Building Task-Specific Interfaces to High Volume Conversational Data · CHI 1997
Recommender systems
resource recommendation
0.011997
Building Task-Specific Interfaces to High Volume Conversational Data · CHI 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text parsing · 0.0tallying · 0.0classification · 0.0abstraction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Building Task-Specific Interfaces to High Volume Conversational Data
abstract
As people participate in the thousands of global conversations that comprise Usenet news, one thing they do is post their opinions of web resources. Phoaks is a collaborative filtering system that continuously parses, classifies, abstracts and tallies those opinions. About 3,500 users per day consult Phoaks web pages that reflect the results. Phoaks also features a general architecture for building similar collaborative filtering interfaces to conversational data. We report here on the Phoaks resource recommendation interface, the architecture, and the issues and experience that make up its rationale. Keywords human-computer interaction, human interface, computersupported cooperative work, organizational computing, social filtering, collaborative filtering, data mining,
Loren G. Terveen, William C. Hill, Brian Amento, David W. McDonald, Josh Creter
CHI5