Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Litao Liu

dblp:25/8404 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
1.012026
FoAM: Foresight-Augmented Multi-Task Imitation Policy for Robotic Manipulation · AAAI 2026
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
manipulation policy
1.012026
FoAM: Foresight-Augmented Multi-Task Imitation Policy for Robotic Manipulation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › transfer imitation learning
multi-task imitation learning
1.012026
FoAM: Foresight-Augmented Multi-Task Imitation Policy for Robotic Manipulation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal goal conditioning · 1.0imitation learning · 1.0foresight augmentation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FoAM: Foresight-Augmented Multi-Task Imitation Policy for Robotic Manipulation
abstract
Multi-task imitation learning (MTIL) has shown significant potential in robotic manipulation by enabling agents to perform various tasks using a single policy. It simplifies the policy deployment and enhances the agent's adaptability across different scenarios. However, key challenges remain, such as maintaining action reliability (e.g., avoiding abnormal action sequences that deviate from nominal task trajectories) and generalizing to unseen tasks with a few expert demonstrations. To address these challenges, we introduce the Foresight-Augmented Manipulation (FoAM) policy, a novel MTIL policy that pioneers the use of multi-modal goal conditions as input and introduces a foresight augmentation in addition to the general action reconstruction. FoAM enables the agent to reason about its actions' visual consequences (foresight) and to be guided by these more expressive representations during task execution. Extensive experiments on over 100 tasks in simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that FoAM significantly enhances MTIL policy performance, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by up to 41% in success rate. We released our simulation suites that include over 80 challenging tasks across more than 10 scenarios designed for manipulation policy training and evaluation.
Litao Liu, Zhuoli Xie, Pengfei Yi 0001, Wenzhao Lian
AAAI1