EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikolaus A. Adams
dblp:25/9745
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5048-8639ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 93% Parallel and multicore computing · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
smoothed particle hydrodynamics |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking Suite · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking Suite · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning and data management
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking Suite · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking Suite · NeurIPS 2023 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
computational fluid dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | 11 PFLOP/s simulations of cloud cavitation collapse · SC 2013 |
High-performance computing › large-scale simulation
extreme-scale simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | 11 PFLOP/s simulations of cloud cavitation collapse · SC 2013 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
petascale computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | 11 PFLOP/s simulations of cloud cavitation collapse · SC 2013 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | 11 PFLOP/s simulations of cloud cavitation collapse · SC 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 2.7temporal coarse-graining · 2.0neighbor search · 2.0JAX · 2.0smoothed particle hydrodynamics solver · 0.8two-phase flow simulation · 0.2performance optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid DynamicsabstractSmoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is omnipresent in modern engineering and scientific disciplines. SPH is a class of Lagrangian schemes that discretize fluid dynamics via finite material points that are tracked through the evolving velocity field. Due to the particle-like nature of the simulation, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as appealing and successful surrogates. However, the practical utility of such GNN-based simulators relies on their ability to faithfully model physics, providing accurate and stable predictions over long time horizons - which is a notoriously hard problem. In this work, we identify particle clustering originating from tensile instabilities as one of the primary pitfalls. Based on these insights, we enhance both training and rollout inference of state-of-the-art GNN-based simulators with varying components from standard SPH solvers, including pressure, viscous, and external force components. All Neural SPH-enhanced simulators achieve better performance than the baseline GNNs, often by orders of magnitude in terms of rollout error, allowing for significantly longer rollouts and significantly better physics modeling. Code available under https://github.com/tumaer/neuralsph. Artur P. Toshev, Jonas A. Erbesdobler, Nikolaus A. Adams, Johannes Brandstetter |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking SuiteabstractMachine learning has been successfully applied to grid-based PDE modeling in various scientific applications. However, learned PDE solvers based on Lagrangian particle discretizations, which are the preferred approach to problems with free surfaces or complex physics, remain largely unexplored. We present LagrangeBench, the first benchmarking suite for Lagrangian particle problems, focusing on temporal coarse-graining. In particular, our contribution is: (a) seven new fluid mechanics datasets (four in 2D and three in 3D) generated with the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method including the Taylor-Green vortex, lid-driven cavity, reverse Poiseuille flow, and dam break, each of which includes different physics like solid wall interactions or free surface, (b) efficient JAX-based API with various recent training strategies and three neighbor search routines, and (c) JAX implementation of established Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) like GNS and SEGNN with baseline results. Finally, to measure the performance of learned surrogates we go beyond established position errors and introduce physical metrics like kinetic energy MSE and Sinkhorn distance for the particle distribution. Our codebase is available under the URL: https://github.com/tumaer/lagrangebench. Artur P. Toshev, Gianluca Galletti, Fabian Fritz, Stefan Adami, Nikolaus A. Adams |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2013 | 11 PFLOP/s simulations of cloud cavitation collapseabstractWe present unprecedented, high throughput simulations of cloud cavitation collapse on 1.6 million cores of Sequoia reaching 55% of its nominal peak performance, corresponding to 11 PFLOP/s. The destructive power of cavitation reduces the lifetime of energy critical systems such as internal combustion engines and hydraulic turbines, yet it has been harnessed for water purification and kidney lithotripsy. The present two-phase flow simulations enable the quantitative prediction of cavitation using 13 trillion grid points to resolve the collapse of 15'000 bubbles. We advance by one order of magnitude the current state-of-the-art in terms of time to solution, and by two orders the geometrical complexity of the flow. The software successfully addresses the challenges that hinder the effective solution of complex flows on contemporary supercomputers, such as limited memory bandwidth, I/O bandwidth and storage capacity. The present work redefines the frontier of high performance computing for fluid dynamics simulations. Diego Rossinelli, Babak Hejazialhosseini, Panagiotis Hadjidoukas, Costas Bekas, Alessandro Curioni, Adam Bertsch, Scott Futral, Steffen J. Schmidt, Nikolaus A. Adams, Petros Koumoutsakos |
SC | 9 |