EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Justin G. Chitpin
dblp:250/0798
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-8692-9616ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
lipidomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BATL: Bayesian annotations for targeted lipidomics · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak annotation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BATL: Bayesian annotations for targeted lipidomics · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-seq analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak calling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian naïve bayes classifier · 0.6resampling · 0.4false discovery rate estimation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | BATL: Bayesian annotations for targeted lipidomicsabstractMOTIVATION: Bioinformatic tools capable of annotating, rapidly and reproducibly, large, targeted lipidomic datasets are limited. Specifically, few programs enable high-throughput peak assessment of liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry data acquired in either selected or multiple reaction monitoring modes. RESULTS: We present here Bayesian Annotations for Targeted Lipidomics, a Gaussian naïve Bayes classifier for targeted lipidomics that annotates peak identities according to eight features related to retention time, intensity, and peak shape. Lipid identification is achieved by modeling distributions of these eight input features across biological conditions and maximizing the joint posterior probabilities of all peak identities at a given transition. When applied to sphingolipid and glycerophosphocholine selected reaction monitoring datasets, we demonstrate over 95% of all peaks are rapidly and correctly identified. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BATL software is freely accessible online at https://complimet.ca/batl/ and is compatible with Safari, Firefox, Chrome and Edge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Justin G. Chitpin, Anuradha Surendra, Thao T. Nguyen, Graeme Taylor, Irina Alecu, Roberto Ortega, Julianna J. Tomlinson, Angela M. Crawley, Michaeline McGuinty, Michael G. Schlossmacher, Rachel Saunders-Pullman, Miroslava Cuperlovic-Culf, Steffany A. L. Bennett, Theodore J. Perkins |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2019 | RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak callsabstractMOTIVATION: Chromatin Immunopreciptation (ChIP)-seq is used extensively to identify sites of transcription factor binding or regions of epigenetic modifications to the genome. A key step in ChIP-seq analysis is peak calling, where genomic regions enriched for ChIP versus control reads are identified. Many programs have been designed to solve this task, but nearly all fall into the statistical trap of using the data twice-once to determine candidate enriched regions, and again to assess enrichment by classical statistical hypothesis testing. This double use of the data invalidates the statistical significance assigned to enriched regions, thus the true significance or reliability of peak calls remains unknown. RESULTS: Using simulated and real ChIP-seq data, we show that three well-known peak callers, MACS, SICER and diffReps, output biased P-values and false discovery rate estimates that can be many orders of magnitude too optimistic. We propose a wrapper algorithm, RECAP, that uses resampling of ChIP-seq and control data to estimate a monotone transform correcting for biases built into peak calling algorithms. When applied to null hypothesis data, where there is no enrichment between ChIP-seq and control, P-values recalibrated by RECAP are approximately uniformly distributed. On data where there is genuine enrichment, RECAP P-values give a better estimate of the true statistical significance of candidate peaks and better false discovery rate estimates, which correlate better with empirical reproducibility. RECAP is a powerful new tool for assessing the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The RECAP software is available through www.perkinslab.ca or on github at https://github.com/theodorejperkins/RECAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Justin G. Chitpin, Aseel Awdeh, Theodore J. Perkins |
Bioinform. | 1 |