Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antonios Somarakis
dblp:250/0895
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-1020-1562ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 92% Medical and health informatics · 8% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | ImaCytE: Visual Exploration of Cellular Micro-Environments for Imaging Mass Cytometry Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell omics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
spatial omics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Visualization and visual analytics › medical visualization
cohort comparison |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive visual analysis · 2.0protein expression profiling · 1.0co-localization analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Visual cohort comparison for spatial single-cell omics-dataabstractSpatially-resolved omics-data enable researchers to precisely distinguish cell types in tissue and explore their spatial interactions, enabling deep understanding of tissue functionality. To understand what causes or deteriorates a disease and identify related biomarkers, clinical researchers regularly perform large-scale cohort studies, requiring the comparison of such data at cellular level. In such studies, with little a-priori knowledge of what to expect in the data, explorative data analysis is a necessity. Here, we present an interactive visual analysis workflow for the comparison of cohorts of spatially-resolved omics-data. Our workflow allows the comparative analysis of two cohorts based on multiple levels-of-detail, from simple abundance of contained cell types over complex co-localization patterns to individual comparison of complete tissue images. As a result, the workflow enables the identification of cohort-differentiating features, as well as outlier samples at any stage of the workflow. During the development of the workflow, we continuously consulted with domain experts. To show the effectiveness of the workflow, we conducted multiple case studies with domain experts from different application areas and with different data modalities. Antonios Somarakis, Marieke E. Ijsselsteijn, Sietse J. Luk, Boyd Kenkhuis, Noel F. C. C. de Miranda, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Thomas Höllt |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2021 | ImaCytE: Visual Exploration of Cellular Micro-Environments for Imaging Mass Cytometry DataabstractTissue functionality is determined by the characteristics of tissue-resident cells and their interactions within their microenvironment. Imaging Mass Cytometry offers the opportunity to distinguish cell types with high precision and link them to their spatial location in intact tissues at sub-cellular resolution. This technology produces large amounts of spatially-resolved high-dimensional data, which constitutes a serious challenge for the data analysis. We present an interactive visual analysis workflow for the end-to-end analysis of Imaging Mass Cytometry data that was developed in close collaboration with domain expert partners. We implemented the presented workflow in an interactive visual analysis tool; ImaCytE. Our workflow is designed to allow the user to discriminate cell types according to their protein expression profiles and analyze their cellular microenvironments, aiding in the formulation or verification of hypotheses on tissue architecture and function. Finally, we show the effectiveness of our workflow and ImaCytE through a case study performed by a collaborating specialist. Antonios Somarakis, Vincent van Unen, Frits Koning, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Thomas Höllt |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |