Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arnab Auddy
dblp:250/6857
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0749-398XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 42% Trustworthy machine learning · 31% Optimization for machine learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Information theory · 56% Computational complexity · 22% Mathematical optimization · 22% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
certified unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certified Machine Unlearning Under High Dimensional Regime · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certified Machine Unlearning Under High Dimensional Regime · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Certified Machine Unlearning Under High Dimensional Regime · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
distributed differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information theory › estimation theory
correlation estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross Validation for Regression With ℓ₁ Regularizers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › sparse regularization
l1 regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross Validation for Regression With ℓ₁ Regularizers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross Validation for Regression With ℓ₁ Regularizers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization
regularized regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross Validation for Regression With ℓ₁ Regularizers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Computational complexity
statistical-computational gaps |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On Estimating Rank-One Spiked Tensors in the Presence of Heavy Tailed Errors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › multivariate estimation
tensor estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On Estimating Rank-One Spiked Tensors in the Presence of Heavy Tailed Errors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy Barriers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax estimation · 1.7newton method · 0.9laplacian noise · 0.9isotropic noise · 0.9confidence intervals · 0.9confidence interval · 0.9leave-one-out cross-validation · 0.8generalized linear model · 0.8tensor SVD · 0.6spectral methods · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional SettingsabstractDespite a large and significant body of recent work focusing on the hyperparameter tuning of regularized models in the high dimensional regime, a theoretical understanding of this problem for non-differentiable penalties such as generalized LASSO and nuclear norm is missing. In this paper we resolve this challenge. We study the hyperparameter tuning problem in the proportional high dimensional regime where both the sample size $n$ and number of features $p$ are large, and $n/p$ and the signal-to-noise ratio (per observation) remain finite. To achieve this goal, we first provide finite-sample upper bounds on the expected squared error of leave-one-out cross-validation (LO) in estimating the out-of-sample risk. Building on this result, we establish the consistency of the hyperparameter tuning method that is based on minimizing LO’s estimate. Our simulation results confirm the accuracy and sharpness of our theoretical results. Haolin Zou, Arnab Auddy, Kamiar Rahnama Rad, Arian Maleki |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2025 | When Data Can't Meet: Estimating Correlation Across Privacy BarriersabstractWe consider the problem of estimating the correlation of two random variables $X$ and $Y$, where the pairs $(X,Y)$ are not observed together, but are instead separated co-ordinate-wise at two servers: server 1 contains all the $X$ observations, and server 2 contains the corresponding $Y$ observations. In this vertically distributed setting, we assume that each server has its own privacy constraints, owing to which they can only share suitably privatized statistics of their own component observations. We consider differing privacy budgets $(\varepsilon_1,\delta_1)$ and $(\varepsilon_2,\delta_2)$ for the two servers and determine the minimax optimal rates for correlation estimation allowing for both non-interactive and interactive mechanisms. We also provide correlation estimators that achieve these rates and further develop inference procedures, namely, confidence intervals, for the estimated correlations. Our results are characterized by an interesting rate in terms of the sample size $n$, $\varepsilon_1$, $\varepsilon_2$, which is strictly slower than the usual central privacy estimation rates. More interestingly, we find that the interactive mechanism is always better than its non-interactive counterpart whenever the two privacy budgets are different. Results from extensive numerical experiments support our theoretical findings. Abhinav Chakraborty 0002, Arnab Auddy, T. Tony Cai |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Certified Machine Unlearning Under High Dimensional RegimeabstractMachine unlearning focuses on the computationally efficient removal of specific training data from trained models, ensuring that the influence of forgotten data is effectively eliminated without the need for full retraining. Despite advances in low-dimensional settings, where the number of parameters \( p \) is much smaller than the sample size \( n \), extending similar theoretical guarantees to high-dimensional regimes remains challenging. We study an unlearning algorithm that starts from the original model parameters and performs a theory-guided sequence of Newton steps. After this update, carefully scaled isotropic Laplacian noise is added to the estimate to ensure that any (potential) residual influence of the deletion set is completely removed. We show that when both \( n, p \to \infty \) with a fixed ratio \( n/p \), significant theoretical and computational obstacles arise due to the interplay between the complexity of the model and the finite signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, we show that, unlike in low-dimensional settings where one Newton step suffices, in high-dimensional problems at least two Newton steps are required to effectively unlearn a fixed number of data points, and even more steps are required when the deletion set scales with $n$. We provide numerical experiments to support the theoretical claims of the paper. Haolin Zou, Arnab Auddy, Yongchan Kwon, Kamiar Rahnama Rad, Arian Maleki |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2024 | Approximate Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Regression with ℓ1 Regularizers
Arnab Auddy, Haolin Zou, Kamiar Rahnama Rad, Arian Maleki |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2024 | Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross Validation for Regression With ℓ₁ RegularizersabstractThe out-of-sample error (OO) is the main quantity of interest in risk estimation and model selection. Leave-one-out cross validation (LO) offers a (nearly) distribution-free yet computationally demanding approach to estimate OO. Recent theoretical work showed that approximate leave-one-out cross validation (ALO) is a computationally efficient and statistically reliable estimate of LO (and OO) for generalized linear models with differentiable regularizers. For problems involving non-differentiable regularizers, despite significant empirical evidence, the theoretical understanding of ALO’s error remains unknown. In this paper, we present a novel theory for a wide class of problems in the generalized linear model family with non-differentiable regularizers. We bound the error$|{\mathrm { ALO}}-{\mathrm { LO}}|$in terms of intuitive metrics such as the size of leave-i-out perturbations in active sets, sample size n, number of features p and regularization parameters. As a consequence, for the$\ell _{1}$-regularized problems, we show that$|{\mathrm { ALO}}-{\mathrm { LO}}| \xrightarrow {p\rightarrow \infty } 0$while$n/p$and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are bounded. Arnab Auddy, Haolin Zou, Kamiar Rahnama Rad, Arian Maleki |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2022 | On Estimating Rank-One Spiked Tensors in the Presence of Heavy Tailed ErrorsabstractIn this paper, we study the estimation of a rank-one spiked tensor in the presence of heavy tailed noise. Our results highlight some of the fundamental similarities and differences in the tradeoff between statistical and computational efficiencies under heavy tailed and Gaussian noise. In particular, we show that, for$p$th order tensors, the tradeoff manifests in an identical fashion as the Gaussian case when the noise has finite$4(p-1)$th moment. The difference in signal strength requirements, with or without computational constraints, for us to estimate the singular vectors at the optimal rate, interestingly, narrows for noise with heavier tails and vanishes when the noise only has finite fourth moment. Moreover, if the noise has less than fourth moment, tensor SVD, perhaps the most natural approach, is suboptimal even though it is computationally intractable. Our analysis exploits a close connection between estimating the rank-one spikes and the spectral norm of a random tensor with iid entries. In particular, we show that the order of the spectral norm of a random tensor can be precisely characterized by the moment of its entries, generalizing classical results for random matrices. In addition to the theoretical guarantees, we propose estimation procedures for the heavy tailed regime, which are easy to implement and efficient to run. Numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate their practical merits. Arnab Auddy, Ming Yuan 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |