Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gilson Y. Shimizu

dblp:250/9069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
conditional coverage
0.612022
CD-split and HPD-split: Efficient Conformal Regions in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.612022
CD-split and HPD-split: Efficient Conformal Regions in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.612022
CD-split and HPD-split: Efficient Conformal Regions in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

split conformal method · 0.6highest predictive density set · 0.6asymptotic analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 CD-split and HPD-split: Efficient Conformal Regions in High Dimensions
abstract
Conformal methods create prediction bands that control average coverage assuming solely i.i.d. data. Although the literature has mostly focused on prediction intervals, more general regions can often better represent uncertainty. For instance, a bimodal target is better represented by the union of two intervals. Such prediction regions are obtained by CD-split, which combines the split method and a data-driven partition of the feature space which scales to high dimensions. CD-split however contains many tuning parameters, and their role is not clear. In this paper, we provide new insights on CD-split by exploring its theoretical properties. In particular, we show that CD-split converges asymptotically to the oracle highest predictive density set and satisfies local and asymptotic conditional validity. We also present simulations that show how to tune CD-split. Finally, we introduce HPD-split, a variation of CD-split that requires less tuning, and show that it shares the same theoretical guarantees as CD-split. In a wide variety of our simulations, CD-split and HPD-split have better conditional coverage and yield smaller prediction regions than other methods.
Rafael Izbicki, Gilson Y. Shimizu, Rafael Bassi Stern
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Flexible distribution-free conditional predictive bands using density estimators
abstract
Conformal methods create prediction bands that control average coverage assuming solely i.i.d. data. Besides average coverage, one might also desire to control conditional coverage, that is, coverage for every new testing point. However, without strong assumptions, conditional coverage is unachievable. Given this limitation, the literature has focused on methods with asymptotical conditional coverage. In order to obtain this property, these methods require strong conditions on the dependence between the target variable and the features. We introduce two conformal methods based on conditional density estimators that do not depend on this type of assumption to obtain asymptotic conditional coverage: Dist-split and CD-split. While Dist-split asymptotically obtains optimal intervals, which are easier to interpret than general regions, CD-split obtains optimal size regions, which are smaller than intervals. CD-split also obtains local coverage by creating prediction bands locally on a partition of the features space. This partition is data-driven and scales to high-dimensional settings. In a wide variety of simulated scenarios, our methods have a better control of conditional coverage and have smaller length than previously proposed methods.
Rafael Izbicki, Gilson Y. Shimizu, Rafael Bassi Stern
AISTATS2