Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Krauter
dblp:251/1708
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9787-0816ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 88% Health and well-being technologies · 12% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing › posture detection
sitting posture recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature Review · CHI 2024 |
Health and well-being technologies › behavior change
sedentary behavior intervention |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature Review · CHI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
literature review · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VisRing: A Display-Extended Smartring for Nano Visualizations
Taiting Lu, Christian Krauter, Runze Liu 0003, Mara Schulte, Alexander Achberger, Tanja Blascheck, Michael Sedlmair, Mahanth Gowda |
UIST | 2 |
| 2024 | Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature ReviewabstractExtensive sitting is unhealthy; thus, countermeasures are needed to react to the ongoing trend toward more prolonged sitting. A variety of studies and guidelines have long addressed the question of how we can improve our sitting habits. Nevertheless, sitting time is still increasing. Here, smart devices can provide a general overview of sitting habits for more nuanced feedback on the user’s sitting posture. Based on a literature review (N=223), including publications from engineering, computer science, medical sciences, electronics, and more, our work guides developers of posture systems. There is a large variety of approaches, with pressure-sensing hardware and visual feedback being the most prominent. We found factors like environment, cost, privacy concerns, portability, and accuracy important for deciding hardware and feedback types. Further, one should consider the user’s capabilities, preferences, and tasks. Regarding user studies for sitting posture feedback, there is a need for better comparability and for investigating long-term effects. Christian Krauter, Katrin Angerbauer, Aimée Sousa Calepso, Alexander Achberger, Sven Mayer, Michael Sedlmair |
CHI | 1 |