Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Krauter

dblp:251/1708 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9787-0816ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 88% Health and well-being technologies · 12%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › posture detection
sitting posture recognition
0.812024
Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature Review · CHI 2024
Health and well-being technologies › behavior change
sedentary behavior intervention
0.212024
Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature Review · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

literature review · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 VisRing: A Display-Extended Smartring for Nano Visualizations
Taiting Lu, Christian Krauter, Runze Liu 0003, Mara Schulte, Alexander Achberger, Tanja Blascheck, Michael Sedlmair, Mahanth Gowda
UIST2
2024 Sitting Posture Recognition and Feedback: A Literature Review
abstract
Extensive sitting is unhealthy; thus, countermeasures are needed to react to the ongoing trend toward more prolonged sitting. A variety of studies and guidelines have long addressed the question of how we can improve our sitting habits. Nevertheless, sitting time is still increasing. Here, smart devices can provide a general overview of sitting habits for more nuanced feedback on the user’s sitting posture. Based on a literature review (N=223), including publications from engineering, computer science, medical sciences, electronics, and more, our work guides developers of posture systems. There is a large variety of approaches, with pressure-sensing hardware and visual feedback being the most prominent. We found factors like environment, cost, privacy concerns, portability, and accuracy important for deciding hardware and feedback types. Further, one should consider the user’s capabilities, preferences, and tasks. Regarding user studies for sitting posture feedback, there is a need for better comparability and for investigating long-term effects.
Christian Krauter, Katrin Angerbauer, Aimée Sousa Calepso, Alexander Achberger, Sven Mayer, Michael Sedlmair
CHI1