Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ansel Blume
dblp:251/1732
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-2401-7621ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 41% Video understanding and tracking · 20% Vision and language · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › robust object detection
long-tailed object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Search and Detect: Training-Free Long Tail Object Detection via Web-Image Retrieval · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Search and Detect: Training-Free Long Tail Object Detection via Web-Image Retrieval · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
open-vocabulary object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Search and Detect: Training-Free Long Tail Object Detection via Web-Image Retrieval · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning System · ACM Multimedia 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
region-based recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Region-Based Representations Revisited · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
region-based segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Region-Based Representations Revisited · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Region-Based Representations Revisited · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual concept recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning System · ACM Multimedia 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › human action analysis
action understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Paxion: Patching Action Knowledge in Video-Language Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Paxion: Patching Action Knowledge in Video-Language Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
temporal understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Paxion: Patching Action Knowledge in Video-Language Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Paxion: Patching Action Knowledge in Video-Language Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Network measurement and analytics
security measurement |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Measuring Security Practices and How They Impact Security · Internet Measurement Conference 2019 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval › object retrieval
image object retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Region-Based Representations Revisited · CVPR 2024 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Region-Based Representations Revisited · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised representation learning · 1.5linear decoder · 1.5knowledge base · 1.5heatmap visualization · 1.5few-shot learning · 1.5web image retrieval · 0.9vision-language embedding · 0.9training-free detection · 0.9multimodal generation · 0.9large language model · 0.9passive monitoring · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SYNTHIA: Novel Concept Design with Affordance CompositionabstractHyeonjeong Ha, Xiaomeng Jin, Jeonghwan Kim, Jiateng Liu, Zhenhailong Wang, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Ansel Blume, Nanyun Peng, Kai-Wei Chang, Heng Ji. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Hyeonjeong Ha, Xiaomeng Jin, Jiateng Liu, Zhenhailong Wang, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Ansel Blume, Nanyun Peng 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Heng Ji 0001 |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2025 | Search and Detect: Training-Free Long Tail Object Detection via Web-Image RetrievalabstractIn this paper, we introduce SearchDet, a training-free long-tail object detection framework that significantly enhances open-vocabulary object detection performance. SearchDet retrieves a set of positive and negative images of an object to ground, embeds these images, and computes an input image–weighted query which is used to detect the desired concept in the image. Our proposed method is simple and training-free, yet achieves over 16.81% mAP improvement on ODinW and 59.85% mAP improvement on LVIS compared to state-of-the-art models such as GroundingDINO. We further show that our approach of basing object detection on a set of Web-retrieved exemplars is stable with respect to variations in the exemplars, suggesting a path towards eliminating costly data annotation and training procedures.1 Mankeerat Sidhu, Hetarth Chopra, Ansel Blume, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Heng Ji 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2025 | PARTONOMY: Large Multimodal Models with Part-Level Visual UnderstandingabstractReal-world objects are composed of distinctive, object-specific parts. Identifying these parts is key to performing fine-grained, compositional reasoning—yet, large multimodal models (LMMs) struggle to perform this seemingly straightforward task. In this work, we introduce PARTONOMY, an LMM benchmark designed for pixel-level part grounding. We construct PARTONOMY from existing part datasets and our own rigorously annotated set of images, encompassing 862 parts and 5346
objects for evaluation. Unlike existing datasets that simply ask models to identify generic parts, PARTONOMY utilizes highly technical concepts and challenges models to compare objects’ parts, consider part-whole relationships, and justify textual predictions with visual segmentations. Our experiments demonstrate significant limitations in state-of-the-art LMMs (e.g., LISA-13B achieves only 5.9% gIoU), highlighting a critical gap in their part grounding abilities. We note that existing segmentation-enabled LMMs (segmenting LMMs) have two key architectural shortcomings: they use special [SEG] tokens not seen during pretraining which induce distribution shift, and they discard predicted segmentations instead of using past predictions to guide future ones. To address these deficiencies, we train several part-centric LMMs and propose PLUM, a novel segmenting LMM that utilizes span tagging instead of segmentation tokens and that conditions on prior predictions in a feedback loop. We find that pretrained PLUM dominates existing segmenting LMMs on reasoning segmentation, VQA, and visual hallucination benchmarks. In addition, PLUM finetuned on our proposed Explanatory Part Segmentation task is competitive with segmenting LMMs trained on significantly more segmentation data. Our work opens up new avenues towards enabling fine-grained, grounded visual understanding in LMMs. Ansel Blume, Hyeonjeong Ha, Elen Chatikyan, Xiaomeng Jin, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Nanyun Peng 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Derek Hoiem, Heng Ji 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Region-Based Representations RevisitedabstractWe investigate whether region-based representations are effective for recognition. Regions were once a mainstay in recognition approaches, but pixel and patch-based features are now used almost exclusively. We show that recent class-agnostic segmenters like SAM can be effectively combined with strong self-supervised representations, like those from DINOv2, and used for a wide variety of tasks, including semantic segmentation, object-based image re-trieval, and multi-image analysis. Once the masks and features are extracted, these representations, even with linear decoders, enable competitive performance, making them well suited to applications that require custom queries. The representations' compactness also makes them well-suited to video analysis and other problems requiring inference across many images. Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Ansel Blume, Yuqun Wu, Sethuraman TV, Heyi Tao, Jae Yong Lee 0006, Wilfredo Torres, Yu-Xiong Wang, Derek Hoiem |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2024 | MIRACLE: An Online, Explainable Multimodal Interactive Concept Learning SystemabstractWe present MIRACLE, a system for online, interpretable visual concept and video action recognition. Through a chat interface, users query the recognition system with an uploaded image or video. For images, MIRACLE returns concept predictions from its structured knowledge base, justifying its predictions with heatmaps and natural language-based attribute detections. For videos, MIRACLE predicts an action and justifies its prediction with time varying entity-entity relations. With its ability to learn new concepts in an online, few-shot manner and its support of dynamic changes to its knowledge base, MIRACLE represents a step forward in interpretable multimodal learning systems. Ansel Blume, Khanh Duy Nguyen, Zhenhailong Wang, Yangyi Chen, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Xiaomeng Jin, Zhen Zhu 0006, Jiateng Liu, Kuan-Hao Huang, Mankeerat Sidhu, Xuanming Zhang, Vivian Liu, Raunak Sinha, Te-Lin Wu, Abhaysinh Zala, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Da Yin, Utkarsh Mall, Zhou Yu 0005, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Camille Cobb, Karrie Karahalios, Lydia B. Chilton, Mohit Bansal, Nanyun Peng 0001, Carl Vondrick, Derek Hoiem, Heng Ji 0001 |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |
| 2023 | Paxion: Patching Action Knowledge in Video-Language Foundation ModelsabstractAction knowledge involves the understanding of textual, visual, and temporal aspects of actions. We introduce the **Action Dynamics Benchmark (ActionBench)** containing two carefully designed probing tasks: Action Antonym and Video Reversal, which targets multimodal alignment capabilities and temporal understanding skills of the model, respectively. Despite recent video-language models’ (VidLM) impressive performance on various benchmark tasks, our diagnostic tasks reveal their surprising deficiency (near-random performance) in action knowledge, suggesting that current models rely on object recognition abilities as a shortcut for action understanding. To remedy this, we propose a novel framework, **Paxion**, along with a new **Discriminative Video Dynamics Modeling (DVDM)** objective. The Paxion framework utilizes a **Knowledge Patcher** network to encode new action knowledge and a **Knowledge Fuser** component to integrate the Patcher into frozen VidLMs without compromising their existing capabilities. Due to limitations of the widely-used Video-Text Contrastive (VTC) loss for learning action knowledge, we introduce the DVDM objective to train the Knowledge Patcher. DVDM forces the model to encode the correlation between the action text and the correct ordering of video frames. Our extensive analyses show that Paxion and DVDM together effectively fill the gap in action knowledge understanding (~50% → 80%), while maintaining or improving performance on a wide spectrum of both object- and action-centric downstream tasks. Zhenhailong Wang, Ansel Blume, Genglin Liu, Jaemin Cho 0001, Zineng Tang, Mohit Bansal, Heng Ji 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Measuring Security Practices and How They Impact SecurityabstractSecurity is a discipline that places significant expectations on lay users. Thus, there are a wide array of technologies and behaviors that we exhort end users to adopt and thereby reduce their security risk. However, the adoption of these "best practices" --- ranging from the use of antivirus products to actively keeping software updated --- is not well understood, nor is their practical impact on security risk well-established. This paper explores both of these issues via a large-scale empirical measurement study covering approximately 15,000 computers over six months. We use passive monitoring to infer and characterize the prevalence of various security practices in situ as well as a range of other potentially security-relevant behaviors. We then explore the extent to which differences in key security behaviors impact real-world outcomes (i.e., that a device shows clear evidence of having been compromised). Louis F. DeKoven, Audrey Randall, Ariana Mirian, Gautam Akiwate, Ansel Blume, Lawrence K. Saul, Aaron Schulman, Geoffrey M. Voelker, Stefan Savage |
Internet Measurement Conference | 5 |