Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mathieu Tanneau

dblp:251/3115 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9967-0578ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
conic optimization
0.812024
Dual Lagrangian Learning for Conic Optimization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 1.5lagrangian duality · 1.5gradient-based primal heuristic · 1.5differentiable conic projection · 1.5compact formulation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Bound Tightening Using Rolling-Horizon Decomposition for Neural Network Verification
Haoruo Zhao, Hassan L. Hijazi, Haydn Thomas Jones, Juston Moore, Mathieu Tanneau, Pascal Van Hentenryck
CPAIOR (2)5
2024 Compact Optimality Verification for Optimization Proxies
abstract
Recent years have witnessed increasing interest in optimization proxies, i.e., machine learning models that approximate the input-output mapping of parametric optimization problems and return near-optimal feasible solutions. Following recent work by (Nellikkath & Chatzivasileiadis, 2021), this paper reconsiders the optimality verification problem for optimization proxies, i.e., the determination of the worst-case optimality gap over the instance distribution. The paper proposes a compact formulation for optimality verification and a gradient-based primal heuristic that brings significant computational benefits to the original formulation. The compact formulation is also more general and applies to non-convex optimization problems. The benefits of the compact formulation are demonstrated on large-scale DC Optimal Power Flow and knapsack problems.
Wenbo Chen 0001, Haoruo Zhao, Mathieu Tanneau, Pascal Van Hentenryck
ICML3
2024 Dual Lagrangian Learning for Conic Optimization
abstract
This paper presents Dual Lagrangian Learning (DLL), a principled learning methodology for dual conic optimization proxies. DLL leverages conic duality and the representation power of ML models to provide high-duality, dual-feasible solutions, and therefore valid Lagrangian dual bounds, for linear and nonlinear conic optimization problems. The paper introduces a systematic dual completion procedure, differentiable conic projection layers, and a self-supervised learning framework based on Lagrangian duality. It also provides closed-form dual completion formulae for broad classes of conic problems, which eliminate the need for costly implicit layers. The effectiveness of DLL is demonstrated on linear and nonlinear conic optimization problems. The proposed methodology significantly outperforms a state-of-the-art learning-based method, and achieves 1000x speedups over commercial interior-point solvers with optimality gaps under 0.5\% on average.
Mathieu Tanneau, Pascal Van Hentenryck
NeurIPS1
2021 Learning chordal extensions
Defeng Liu, Andrea Lodi 0001, Mathieu Tanneau
J. Glob. Optim.3