Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Souza

dblp:251/3581 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction
0.412019
PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.412019
multiPhATE: bioinformatics pipeline for functional annotation of phage isolates · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
phage genome annotation
0.412019
multiPhATE: bioinformatics pipeline for functional annotation of phage isolates · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › viral genomics
phage genomics
0.412019
PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted graph · 0.4pipeline · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Decepti-SCADA: A Framework for Actively Defending Networked Critical Infrastructures
Nicholas Cifranic, Jose Romero-Mariona, Brian Souza, Roger Hallman
IoTBDS3
2019 PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes
abstract
MOTIVATION: Currently there are no tools specifically designed for annotating genes in phages. Several tools are available that have been adapted to run on phage genomes, but due to their underlying design, they are unable to capture the full complexity of phage genomes. Phages have adapted their genomes to be extremely compact, having adjacent genes that overlap and genes completely inside of other longer genes. This non-delineated genome structure makes it difficult for gene prediction using the currently available gene annotators. Here we present PHANOTATE, a novel method for gene calling specifically designed for phage genomes. Although the compact nature of genes in phages is a problem for current gene annotators, we exploit this property by treating a phage genome as a network of paths: where open reading frames are favorable, and overlaps and gaps are less favorable, but still possible. We represent this network of connections as a weighted graph, and use dynamic programing to find the optimal path. RESULTS: We compare PHANOTATE to other gene callers by annotating a set of 2133 complete phage genomes from GenBank, using PHANOTATE and the three most popular gene callers. We found that the four programs agree on 82% of the total predicted genes, with PHANOTATE predicting more genes than the other three. We searched for these extra genes in both GenBank's non-redundant protein database and all of the metagenomes in the sequence read archive, and found that they are present at levels that suggest that these are functional protein-coding genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/deprekate/PHANOTATE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Katelyn McNair, Carol Zhou, Elizabeth A. Dinsdale, Brian Souza, Robert A. Edwards
Bioinform.4
2019 multiPhATE: bioinformatics pipeline for functional annotation of phage isolates
abstract
SUMMARY: To address the need for improved phage annotation tools that scale, we created an automated throughput annotation pipeline: multiple-genome Phage Annotation Toolkit and Evaluator (multiPhATE). multiPhATE is a throughput pipeline driver that invokes an annotation pipeline (PhATE) across a user-specified set of phage genomes. This tool incorporates a de novo phage gene calling algorithm and assigns putative functions to gene calls using protein-, virus- and phage-centric databases. multiPhATE's modular construction allows the user to implement all or any portion of the analyses by acquiring local instances of the desired databases and specifying the desired analyses in a configuration file. We demonstrate multiPhATE by annotating two newly sequenced Yersinia pestis phage genomes. Within multiPhATE, the PhATE processing pipeline can be readily implemented across multiple processors, making it adaptable for throughput sequencing projects. Software documentation assists the user in configuring the system. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: multiPhATE was implemented in Python 3.7, and runs as a command-line code under Linux or Unix. multiPhATE is freely available under an open-source BSD3 license from https://github.com/carolzhou/multiPhATE. Instructions for acquiring the databases and third-party codes used by multiPhATE are included in the distribution README file. Users may report bugs by submitting to the github issues page associated with the multiPhATE distribution. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Carol L. Ecale Zhou, Stephanie Malfatti, Jeffrey A. Kimbrel, Casandra Philipson, Katelyn McNair, Theron Hamilton, Robert A. Edwards, Brian Souza
Bioinform.8