EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yash Savani
dblp:251/8428
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9642-3988ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Rendering · 50% Computational photography and imaging · 50% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | NAS-Bench-x11 and the Power of Learning Curves · NeurIPS 2021 BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 A Study on Encodings for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search › search space design
architecture encoding |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 A Study on Encodings for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety › content safety
harmful content mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Antidistillation Sampling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
model security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Antidistillation Sampling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
safety alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusing Differentiable Representations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusing Differentiable Representations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equilibrium models
deep equilibrium model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design
implicit layer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NAS-Bench-x11 and the Power of Learning Curves · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
multi-fidelity optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NAS-Bench-x11 and the Power of Learning Curves · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data curation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AI · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
reasoning traces |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Antidistillation Sampling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Rendering
neural radiance fields |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusing Differentiable Representations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational photography and imaging › panoramic imaging
panorama generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusing Differentiable Representations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
fixed-point iteration |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow Estimation · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Study on Encodings for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reverse-time process · 1.5diffusion model · 1.5token probability distribution · 0.9sampling strategy · 0.9safety rephrasing · 0.9safety filtering · 0.9native refusal training · 0.9implicit differentiation · 0.6fixed-point solver · 0.6deep equilibrium model · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AIabstractAs large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, the risk of generating harmful or toxic content remains a central challenge. Post-hoc alignment methods are brittle: once unsafe patterns are learned during pretraining, they are hard to remove.
In this work, we present a data-centric pretraining framework that builds safety into the model from the start. Our framework consists of four key steps:
(i) Safety Filtering: building a safety classifier to classify webdata into safe and unsafe categories;
(ii) Safety Rephrasing: we recontextualize unsafe webdata into safer narratives;
(iii) Native Refusal: we synthetically generate pretraining datasets that actively teach models to refuse on unsafe content and the moral reasoning behind it, and
(iv) Harmfulness-Tag annotated pretraining: we flag unsafe content during pretraining using a special token, and use it to steer models away from unsafe generations at inference-time.
Our safety-pretrained models reduce attack success rates from 38.8% to 8.4% on standard LLM safety benchmarks with no performance degradation on general tasks. Pratyush Maini, Sachin Goyal, Dylan Sam, Alexander Robey, Yash Savani, Yiding Jiang, Andy Zou, Matt Fredrikson, Zachary C. Lipton, J. Zico Kolter |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2025 | Antidistillation SamplingabstractFrontier models that generate extended reasoning traces inadvertently produce token sequences that can facilitate model distillation. Recognizing this vulnerability, model owners may seek sampling strategies that limit the effectiveness of distillation without compromising model performance. *Antidistillation sampling* provides exactly this capability. By strategically modifying a model's next-token probability distribution, antidistillation sampling poisons reasoning traces, rendering them significantly less effective for distillation while preserving the model's utility. Yash Savani, Asher Trockman, Zhili Feng, Yixuan Even Xu, Avi Schwarzschild, Alexander Robey, Marc Finzi, J. Zico Kolter |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Diffusing Differentiable RepresentationsabstractWe introduce a novel, training-free method for sampling *differentiable representations* (diffreps) using pretrained diffusion models. Rather than merely mode-seeking, our method achieves sampling by "pulling back" the dynamics of the reverse-time process—from the image space to the diffrep parameter space—and updating the parameters according to this pulled-back process. We identify an implicit constraint on the samples induced by the diffrep and demonstrate that addressing this constraint significantly improves the consistency and detail of the generated objects. Our method yields diffreps with substantially **improved quality and diversity** for images, panoramas, and 3D NeRFs compared to existing techniques. Our approach is a general-purpose method for sampling diffreps, expanding the scope of problems that diffusion models can tackle. Yash Savani, Marc Finzi, J. Zico Kolter |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow EstimationabstractMany recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) optical flow models use finite-step recurrent update operations to emulate traditional algorithms by encouraging iterative refinements toward a stable flow estimation. However, these RNNs impose large computation and memory overheads, and are not directly trained to model such “stable estimation”. They can converge poorly and thereby suffer from performance degradation. To combat these drawbacks, we propose deep equilibrium (DEQ)flow estimators, an approach that directly solves for the flow as the infinite-level fixed point of an implicit layer (using any black-box solver) [3], and differentiates through this fixed point analytically (thus requiring$O(1)$training memory). This implicit-depth approach is not predicated on any specific model, and thus can be applied to a wide range of SOTA flow estimation model designs (e.g., RAFT [1] and GMA [2]). The use of these DEQflow estimators allows us to compute the flow faster using, e.g., fixed-point reuse and inexact gradients, consumes$4\sim 6\times less$training memory than the recurrent counterpart, and achieves better results with the same computation budget. In addition, we propose a novel, sparse fixed-point correction scheme to stabilize our DEQ flow estimators, which addresses a longstanding challenge for DEQ models in general. We test our approach in various realistic settings and show that it improves SOTA methods on Sintel and KITTI datasets with substantially better computational and memory efficiency. Shaojie Bai, Zhengyang Geng, Yash Savani, J. Zico Kolter |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2021 | BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture SearchabstractOver the past half-decade, many methods have been considered for neural architecture search (NAS). Bayesian optimization (BO), which has long had success in hyperparameter optimization, has recently emerged as a very promising strategy for NAS when it is coupled with a neural predictor. Recent work has proposed different instantiations of this framework, for example, using Bayesian neural networks or graph convolutional networks as the predictive model within BO. However, the analyses in these papers often focus on the full-fledged NAS algorithm, so it is difficult to tell which individual components of the framework lead to the best performance. In this work, we give a thorough analysis of the "BO + neural predictor framework" by identifying five main components: the architecture encoding, neural predictor, uncertainty calibration method, acquisition function, and acquisition function optimization. We test several different methods for each component and also develop a novel path-based encoding scheme for neural architectures, which we show theoretically and empirically scales better than other encodings. Using all of our analyses, we develop a final algorithm called BANANAS, which achieves state-of-the-art performance on NAS search spaces. We adhere to the NAS research checklist (Lindauer and Hutter 2019) to facilitate best practices, and our code is available at https://github.com/naszilla/naszilla. Colin White, Willie Neiswanger, Yash Savani |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2021 | NAS-Bench-x11 and the Power of Learning CurvesabstractWhile early research in neural architecture search (NAS) required extreme computational resources, the recent releases of tabular and surrogate benchmarks have greatly increased the speed and reproducibility of NAS research. However, two of the most popular benchmarks do not provide the full training information for each architecture. As a result, on these benchmarks it is not possible to evaluate many types of multi-fidelity algorithms, such as learning curve extrapolation, that require evaluating architectures at arbitrary epochs. In this work, we present a method using singular value decomposition and noise modeling to create surrogate benchmarks, NAS-Bench-111, NAS-Bench-311, and NAS-Bench-NLP11, that output the full training information for each architecture, rather than just the final validation accuracy. We demonstrate the power of using the full training information by introducing a learning curve extrapolation framework to modify single-fidelity algorithms, showing that it leads to improvements over popular single-fidelity algorithms which claimed to be state-of-the-art upon release. Colin White, Yash Savani, Frank Hutter |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Exploring the loss landscape in neural architecture searchabstractNeural architecture search (NAS) has seen a steep rise in interest over the last few years. Many algorithms for NAS consist of searching through a space of architectures by iteratively choosing an architecture, evaluating its performance by training it, and using all prior evaluations to come up with the next choice. The evaluation step is noisy - the final accuracy varies based on the random initialization of the weights. Prior work has focused on devising new search algorithms to handle this noise, rather than quantifying or understanding the level of noise in architecture evaluations. In this work, we show that (1) the simplest hill-climbing algorithm is a powerful baseline for NAS, and (2), when the noise in popular NAS benchmark datasets is reduced to a minimum, the loss landscape becomes near-convex, causing hill-climbing to outperform many popular state-of-the-art algorithms. We further back up this observation by showing that the number of local minima is substantially reduced as the noise decreases and by giving a theoretical characterization of the performance of local search in NAS. Based on our findings, for NAS research we suggest (1) using local search as a baseline, and (2) denoising the training pipeline when possible. Colin White, Sam Nolen, Yash Savani |
UAI | 3 |
| 2020 | Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural NetworksabstractAs deep learning models become tasked with more and more decisions that impact human lives, such as criminal recidivism, loan repayment, and face recognition for law enforcement, bias is becoming a growing concern. Debiasing algorithms are typically split into three paradigms: pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing. However, in computer vision or natural language applications, it is common to start with a large generic model and then fine-tune to a specific use-case. Pre- or in-processing methods would require retraining the entire model from scratch, while post-processing methods only have black-box access to the model, so they do not leverage the weights of the trained model. Creating debiasing algorithms specifically for this fine-tuning use-case has largely been neglected. In this work, we initiate the study of a new paradigm in debiasing research, intra-processing, which sits between in-processing and post-processing methods. Intra-processing methods are designed specifically to debias large models which have been trained on a generic dataset, and fine-tuned on a more specific task. We show how to repurpose existing in-processing methods for this use-case, and we also propose three baseline algorithms: random perturbation, layerwise optimization, and adversarial debiasing. We evaluate these methods across three popular datasets from the AIF360 toolkit, as well as on the CelebA faces dataset. Our code is available at https://github.com/abacusai/intraprocessing_debiasing. Yash Savani, Colin White, Naveen Sundar G. |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Study on Encodings for Neural Architecture SearchabstractNeural architecture search (NAS) has been extensively studied in the past few years. A popular approach is to represent each neural architecture in the search space as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), and then search over all DAGs by encoding the adjacency matrix and list of operations as a set of hyperparameters. Recent work has demonstrated that even small changes to the way each architecture is encoded can have a significant effect on the performance of NAS algorithms. In this work, we present the first formal study on the effect of architecture encodings for NAS, including a theoretical grounding and an empirical study. First we formally define architecture encodings and give a theoretical characterization on the scalability of the encodings we study. Then we identify the main encoding-dependent subroutines which NAS algorithms employ, running experiments to show which encodings work best with each subroutine for many popular algorithms. The experiments act as an ablation study for prior work, disentangling the algorithmic and encoding-based contributions, as well as a guideline for future work. Our results demonstrate that NAS encodings are an important design decision which can have a significant impact on overall performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/naszilla/naszilla. Colin White, Willie Neiswanger, Sam Nolen, Yash Savani |
NeurIPS | 4 |