Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anton Khristoforov
dblp:251/8796
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure arithmetic › secure matrix computation
secure distributed matrix multiplication |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Codes Trading Upload for Download Cost in Secure Distributed Matrix Multiplication · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
polynomial codes |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Codes Trading Upload for Download Cost in Secure Distributed Matrix Multiplication · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
secure cross subspace alignment · 1.0polynomial codes · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Codes Trading Upload for Download Cost in Secure Distributed Matrix MultiplicationabstractIn secure distributed matrix multiplication (SDMM) the multiplication$\boldsymbol A \boldsymbol B$from two private matrices$\boldsymbol A$and$\boldsymbol B$is outsourced to$N$distributed servers. In$\ell $-SDMM, the goal is to design a joint communication-computation procedure that optimally balances conflicting communication and computation metrics without leaking any information on both$\boldsymbol A$and$\boldsymbol B$to any set of$\ell {< }N$servers. To this end, the user applies coding with$\tilde { \boldsymbol A}_{i}$and$\tilde { \boldsymbol B}_{i}$representing encoded versions of$\boldsymbol A$and$\boldsymbol B$destined to the$i$-th server. Now, SDMM involves multiple tradeoffs. One such tradeoff is the tradeoff between upload (UL) and download (DL) costs. To find a good balance between these two metrics, we propose two schemes which we term USCSA and GSCSA that are based on secure cross subspace alignment (SCSA). We show that there are various scenarios where they outperform existing SDMM schemes from the literature with respect to UL-DL efficiency. Next, we implement schemes from the literature, including USCSA and GSCSA, and test their performance on Amazon EC2. Our numerical results show that USCSA and GSCSA establish a good balance between the time spent on the communication and computation in SDMMs. This is because they combine advantages of polynomial codes, namely low time for the upload of$\tilde { \boldsymbol A}_{i}$and$\tilde { \boldsymbol B}_{i}$,$i\in [1:N]$, and the computation of$\boldsymbol O_{i}=\tilde { \boldsymbol A}_{i}\tilde { \boldsymbol B}_{i}$, with those of SCSA, being a low timing overhead for the download of$\boldsymbol O_{i}$,$i\in [1:N]$, and the decoding of$\boldsymbol A \boldsymbol B$. Jaber Kakar, Anton Khristoforov, Seyedhamed Ebadifar, Aydin Sezgin |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |
| 2020 | Uplink Cost Adjustable Schemes in Secure Distributed Matrix MultiplicationabstractIn secure distributed matrix multiplication (SDMM) the multiplication AB from two private matrices A and B is outsourced by a user to N distributed servers. In ℓ-SDMM, the goal is to design a joint communication-computation procedure that optimally balances conflicting communication and computation metrics without leaking any information on both A and B to any set of ℓ ≤ N servers. To this end, the user applies coding with Ãiand B̃irepresenting encoded versions of A and B destined to the i-th server. Now, SDMM involves multiple tradeoffs. One such tradeoff is the tradeoff between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) costs. To find a good balance between these two metrics, we propose two schemes which we term USCSA and GSCSA that are based on secure cross subspace alignment (SCSA). We implement schemes from the literature, in addition to USCSA and GSCSA, and test their performance on Amazon EC2. Our numerical results show that USCSA and GSCSA establish a good balance between the time spend on the communication and computation in SDMMs. This is because they combine advantages of polynomial codes, namely low time for the upload of (Ãi, B̃i)i=1Nand the computation of Oi= Ãi, B̃i, with those of SCSA, being a low timing overhead for the download of (Oi)i=1Nand the decoding of AB. Jaber Kakar, Anton Khristoforov, Seyedhamed Ebadifar, Aydin Sezgin |
ISIT | 2 |