EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jia Kok
dblp:251/8804
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 33% Robot manipulation · 33% Motion planning and robot control · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
flapping-wing robot |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
morphology optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot design |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing design · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.4automated design · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Sim2real gap is non-monotonic with robot complexity for morphology-in-the-loop flapping wing designabstractMorphology of a robot design is important to its ability to achieve a stated goal and therefore applying machine learning approaches that incorporate morphology in the design space can provide scope for significant advantage. Our study is set in a domain known to be reliant on morphology: flapping wing flight. We developed a parameterised morphology design space that draws features from biological exemplars and apply automated design to produce a set of high performance robot morphologies in simulation. By performing sim2real transfer on a selection, for the first time we measured the shape of the reality gap for variations in design complexity. We found for the flapping wing that the reality gap changes non-monotonically with complexity, suggesting that certain morphology details narrow the gap more than others, and that such details could be identified and further optimised in a future end-to-end automated morphology design process. Kent Rosser, Jia Kok, Javaan S. Chahl, Josh C. Bongard |
ICRA | 2 |