Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huaqing Xiong
dblp:251/9111
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 43% Learning theory · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Mathematical optimization · 46% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
1.9 | 4 | 2021 | Faster Non-asymptotic Convergence for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2021 Non-asymptotic Convergence of Adam-type Reinforcement Learning Algorithms under Markovian Sampling · AAAI 2021 Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | Faster Non-asymptotic Convergence for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2021 Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 Analysis of Q-learning with Adaptation and Momentum Restart for Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
adaptive gradient methods |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic Convergence of Adam-type Reinforcement Learning Algorithms under Markovian Sampling · AAAI 2021 Analysis of Q-learning with Adaptation and Momentum Restart for Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic Convergence of Adam-type Reinforcement Learning Algorithms under Markovian Sampling · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Non-asymptotic Convergence of Adam-type Reinforcement Learning Algorithms under Markovian Sampling · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning › q-learning
double q-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
finite-time analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
double q-learning · 1.0constant learning rate · 1.0AMSGrad · 0.9stochastic approximation · 0.9finite-time analysis · 0.9nonlinear function approximation · 0.5markovian sampling · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4momentum restart · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Deterministic policy gradient: Convergence analysisabstractThe deterministic policy gradient (DPG) method proposed in Silver et al. [2014] has been demonstrated to exhibit superior performance particularly for applications with multi-dimensional and continuous action spaces. However, it remains unclear whether DPG converges, and if so, how fast it converges and whether it converges as efficiently as other PG methods. In this paper, we provide a theoretical analysis of DPG to answer those questions. We study the single timescale DPG (often the case in practice) in both on-policy and off-policy settings, and show that both algorithms attain an $\epsilon$-accurate stationary policy with a sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$. Moreover, we establish the convergence rate for DPG under Gaussian noise exploration, which is widely adopted in practice to improve the performance of DPG. To our best knowledge, this is the first non-asymptotic convergence characterization for DPG methods. Huaqing Xiong, Tengyu Xu, Lin Zhao 0009, Yingbin Liang, Wei Zhang 0013 |
UAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Non-asymptotic Convergence of Adam-type Reinforcement Learning Algorithms under Markovian SamplingabstractDespite the wide applications of Adam in reinforcement learning (RL), the theoretical convergence of Adam-type RL algorithms has not been established. This paper provides the first such convergence analysis for two fundamental RL algorithms of policy gradient (PG) and temporal difference (TD) learning that incorporate AMSGrad updates (a standard alternative of Adam in theoretical analysis), referred to as PG-AMSGrad and TD-AMSGrad, respectively. Moreover, our analysis focuses on Markovian sampling for both algorithms. We show that under general nonlinear function approximation, PG-AMSGrad with a constant stepsize converges to a neighborhood of a stationary point at the rate of O(1/T) (where T denotes the number of iterations), and with a diminishing stepsize converges exactly to a stationary point at the rate of O(log^2 T/√T). Furthermore, under linear function approximation, TD-AMSGrad with a constant stepsize converges to a neighborhood of the global optimum at the rate of O(1/T), and with a diminishing stepsize converges exactly to the global optimum at the rate of O(log T/√T). Our study develops new techniques for analyzing the Adam-type RL algorithms under Markovian sampling. Huaqing Xiong, Tengyu Xu, Yingbin Liang, Wei Zhang 0013 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Faster Non-asymptotic Convergence for Double Q-learningabstractDouble Q-learning (Hasselt, 2010) has gained significant success in practice due to its effectiveness in overcoming the overestimation issue of Q-learning. However, the theoretical understanding of double Q-learning is rather limited. The only existing finite-time analysis was recently established in (Xiong et al. 2020), where the polynomial learning rate adopted in the analysis typically yields a slower convergence rate. This paper tackles the more challenging case of a constant learning rate, and develops new analytical tools that improve the existing convergence rate by orders of magnitude. Specifically, we show that synchronous double Q-learning attains an $\epsilon$-accurate global optimum with a time complexity of $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{\ln D}{(1-\gamma)^7\epsilon^2} \right)$, and the asynchronous algorithm achieves a time complexity of $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{L}{(1-\gamma)^7\epsilon^2} \right)$, where $D$ is the cardinality of the state-action space, $\gamma$ is the discount factor, and $L$ is a parameter related to the sampling strategy for asynchronous double Q-learning. These results improve the existing convergence rate by the order of magnitude in terms of its dependence on all major parameters $(\epsilon,1-\gamma, D, L)$. This paper presents a substantial step toward the full understanding of the fast convergence of double-Q learning. Lin Zhao 0009, Huaqing Xiong, Yingbin Liang |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Finite-time theory for momentum Q-learningabstractExisting studies indicate that momentum ideas in conventional optimization can be used to improve the performance of Q-learning algorithms. However, the finite-time analysis for momentum-based Q-learning algorithms is only available for the tabular case without function approximation. This paper analyzes a class of momentum-based Q-learning algorithms with finite-time convergence guarantee. Specifically, we propose the MomentumQ algorithm, which integrates the Nesterov’s and Polyak’s momentum schemes, and generalizes the existing momentum-based Q-learning algorithms. For the infinite state-action space case, we establish the convergence guarantee for MomentumQ with linear function approximation under Markovian sampling. In particular, we characterize a finite-time convergence rate which is provably faster than the vanilla Q-learning. This is the first finite-time analysis for momentum-based Q-learning algorithms with function approximation. For the tabular case under synchronous sampling, we also obtain a finite-time convergence rate that is slightly better than the SpeedyQ (Azar et al., NIPS 2011). Finally, we demonstrate through various experiments that the proposed MomentumQ outperforms other momentum-based Q-learning algorithms. Bowen Weng, Huaqing Xiong, Lin Zhao 0009, Yingbin Liang, Wei Zhang 0013 |
UAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Analysis of Q-learning with Adaptation and Momentum Restart for Gradient DescentabstractExisting convergence analyses of Q-learning mostly focus on the vanilla stochastic gradient descent (SGD) type of updates. Despite the Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) has been commonly used for practical Q-learning algorithms, there has not been any convergence guarantee provided for Q-learning with such type of updates. In this paper, we first characterize the convergence rate for Q-AMSGrad, which is the Q-learning algorithm with AMSGrad update (a commonly adopted alternative of Adam for theoretical analysis). To further improve the performance, we propose to incorporate the momentum restart scheme to Q-AMSGrad, resulting in the so-called Q-AMSGradR algorithm. The convergence rate of Q-AMSGradR is also established. Our experiments on a linear quadratic regulator problem demonstrate that the two proposed Q-learning algorithms outperform the vanilla Q-learning with SGD updates. The two algorithms also exhibit significantly better performance than the DQN learning method over a batch of Atari 2600 games. Bowen Weng, Huaqing Xiong, Yingbin Liang, Wei Zhang 0013 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Finite-Time Analysis for Double Q-learningabstractAlthough Q-learning is one of the most successful algorithms for finding the best action-value function (and thus the optimal policy) in reinforcement learning, its implementation often suffers from large overestimation of Q-function values incurred by random sampling. The double Q-learning algorithm proposed in~\citet{hasselt2010double} overcomes such an overestimation issue by randomly switching the update between two Q-estimators, and has thus gained significant popularity in practice. However, the theoretical understanding of double Q-learning is rather limited. So far only the asymptotic convergence has been established, which does not characterize how fast the algorithm converges. In this paper, we provide the first non-asymptotic (i.e., finite-time) analysis for double Q-learning. We show that both synchronous and asynchronous double Q-learning are guaranteed to converge to an $\epsilon$-accurate neighborhood of the global optimum by taking $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\left( \frac{1}{(1-\gamma)^6\epsilon^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{\omega}} +\left(\frac{1}{1-\gamma}\right)^{\frac{1}{1-\omega}}\right)$ iterations, where $\omega\in(0,1)$ is the decay parameter of the learning rate, and $\gamma$ is the discount factor. Our analysis develops novel techniques to derive finite-time bounds on the difference between two inter-connected stochastic processes, which is new to the literature of stochastic approximation. Huaqing Xiong, Lin Zhao 0009, Yingbin Liang, Wei Zhang 0013 |
NeurIPS | 1 |