Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Talip Ucar

dblp:251/9215 · also Talip Uçar · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.812024
Improving Antibody Humanness Prediction using Patent Data · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
weakly-supervised contrastive learning
0.812024
Improving Antibody Humanness Prediction using Patent Data · ICML 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody design
0.812024
Improving Antibody Humanness Prediction using Patent Data · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning › deep representation learning
autoencoder representation learning
0.512021
SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning
0.512021
SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
tabular representation learning
0.512021
SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Data mining
tabular data
0.112021
SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-stage training · 1.5multi-loss training · 1.5cross-entropy loss · 1.5multi-view learning · 1.0collaborative inference · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Improving Antibody Humanness Prediction using Patent Data
abstract
We investigate the potential of patent data for improving the antibody humanness prediction using a multi-stage, multi-loss training process. Humanness serves as a proxy for the immunogenic response to antibody therapeutics, one of the major causes of attrition in drug discovery and a challenging obstacle for their use in clinical settings. We pose the initial learning stage as a weakly-supervised contrastive-learning problem, where each antibody sequence is associated with possibly multiple identifiers of function and the objective is to learn an encoder that groups them according to their patented properties. We then freeze a part of the contrastive encoder and continue training it on the patent data using the cross-entropy loss to predict the humanness score of a given antibody sequence. We illustrate the utility of the patent data and our approach by performing inference on three different immunogenicity datasets, unseen during training. Our empirical results demonstrate that the learned model consistently outperforms the alternative baselines and establishes new state-of-the-art on five out of six inference tasks, irrespective of the used metric.
Talip Ucar, Aubin Ramon, Dino Oglic, Rebecca Croasdale-Wood, Tom Diethe, Pietro Sormanni
ICML1
2021 SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learning
abstract
Self-supervised learning has been shown to be very effective in learning useful representations, and yet much of the success is achieved in data types such as images, audio, and text. The success is mainly enabled by taking advantage of spatial, temporal, or semantic structure in the data through augmentation. However, such structure may not exist in tabular datasets commonly used in fields such as healthcare, making it difficult to design an effective augmentation method, and hindering a similar progress in tabular data setting. In this paper, we introduce a new framework, Subsetting features of Tabular data (SubTab), that turns the task of learning from tabular data into a multi-view representation learning problem by dividing the input features to multiple subsets. We argue that reconstructing the data from the subset of its features rather than its corrupted version in an autoencoder setting can better capture its underlying latent representation. In this framework, the joint representation can be expressed as the aggregate of latent variables of the subsets at test time, which we refer to as collaborative inference. Our experiments show that the SubTab achieves the state of the art (SOTA) performance of 98.31% on MNIST in tabular setting, on par with CNN-based SOTA models, and surpasses existing baselines on three other real-world datasets by a significant margin.
Talip Ucar, Ehsan Hajiramezanali, Lindsay Edwards
NeurIPS1