EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oleg Balabanov
dblp:251/9629
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 61% Language models and text generation · 39% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LIFT the Veil for the Truth: Principal Weights Emerge after Rank Reduction for Reasoning-Focused Supervised Fine-Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LIFT the Veil for the Truth: Principal Weights Emerge after Rank Reduction for Reasoning-Focused Supervised Fine-Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
sparse fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LIFT the Veil for the Truth: Principal Weights Emerge after Rank Reduction for Reasoning-Focused Supervised Fine-Tuning · ICML 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed Architectures · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
matrix approximation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed Architectures · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation › low-rank approximation
nyström method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed Architectures · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed Architectures · ICML 2023 |
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra
distributed matrix computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed Architectures · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subsampled randomized hadamard transform · 1.3oblivious subspace embedding · 1.3magnitude-based pruning · 0.9low-rank approximation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LIFT the Veil for the Truth: Principal Weights Emerge after Rank Reduction for Reasoning-Focused Supervised Fine-TuningabstractRecent studies have shown that supervised fine-tuning of LLMs on a small number of high-quality datasets can yield strong reasoning capabilities. However, full fine-tuning (Full FT), while powerful, is computationally expensive and susceptible to overfitting and catastrophic forgetting, particularly when data is limited. Sparse fine-tuning, which previously achieved notable success by updating only a small subset of model parameters, offers a promising trade-off between efficiency and effectiveness. Yet, it has lagged behind in the LLM era due to the difficulty of identifying parameters truly critical for reasoning. In this work, we state that weights with the largest magnitude after low-rank approximation are critical weights for fine-tuning, which we call *Principal Weights*. Surprisingly, while magnitude-based sparse fine-tuning performs poorly as a baseline on LLM fine-tuning, it becomes highly effective after rank reduction. These insights motivate our method: **L**ow-rank **I**nformed Sparse **F**ine-**T**uning ($\texttt{LIFT}$). $\texttt{LIFT}$ only updates the top 5% *Principal Weights* throughout training and consistently achieves better performance on reasoning tasks than Full FT, while maintaining memory efficiency on par with popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. In addition to strong performance on target domains such as arithmetic reasoning, $\texttt{LIFT}$ also retains up to 20% more source-domain knowledge, compared to Full FT and LoRA. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zihanghliu/LIFT. Tianyu Pang, Oleg Balabanov, Tianjin Huang, Lu Yin 0006, Yaoqing Yang 0002, Shiwei Liu 0003 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Block Subsampled Randomized Hadamard Transform for Nyström Approximation on Distributed ArchitecturesabstractThis article introduces a novel structured random matrix composed blockwise from subsampled randomized Hadamard transforms (SRHTs). The block SRHT is expected to outperform well-known dimension reduction maps, including SRHT and Gaussian matrices on distributed architectures. We prove that a block SRHT with enough rows is an oblivious subspace embedding, i.e., an approximate isometry for an arbitrary low-dimensional subspace with high probability. Our estimate of the required number of rows is similar to that of the standard SRHT. This suggests that the two transforms should provide the same accuracy of approximation in the algorithms. The block SRHT can be readily incorporated into randomized methods for computing a low-rank approximation of a large-scale matrix, such as the Nyström method. For completeness, we revisit this method with a discussion of its implementation on distributed architectures. Oleg Balabanov, Matthias Beaupère, Laura Grigori, Victor Lederer |
ICML | 1 |