Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiangxiang Shen
dblp:252/0010
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-7387-7455ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 70% Generative modeling · 15% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property Prediction · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property Prediction · IJCAI 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › materials informatics
crystal property prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property Prediction · IJCAI 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
materials informatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property Prediction · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion Model · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion Model · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion Model · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion Model · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property Prediction · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise distance distribution · 1.7message passing · 1.7graph transformer · 1.7hyperbolic latent diffusion · 0.8autoencoder · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PDDFormer: Pairwise Distance Distribution Graph Transformer for Crystal Material Property PredictionabstractCrystal structures can be simplified as a periodic point set that repeats across three-dimensional space along an underlying lattice. Traditionally, crystal representation methods rely on descriptors such as lattice parameters, symmetry, and space groups to characterize the structure. However, in reality, atoms in materials always vibrate above absolute zero, causing their positions to fluctuate continuously. This dynamic behavior disrupts the fundamental periodicity of the lattice, making crystal graphs based on static lattice parameters and conventional descriptors discontinuous under slight perturbations. Chemists proposed the pairwise distance distribution (PDD) method to address this. However, the completeness of PDD requires defining a large number of neighboring atoms, leading to high computational costs. Additionally, PDD does not account for atomic information, making it challenging to apply it directly to crystal material property prediction tasks. To tackle these challenges, we introduce the atom-weighted Pairwise Distance Distribution (WPDD) and Unit cell Pairwise Distance Distribution (UPDD) for the first time, applying them to the construction of multi-edge crystal graphs. We demonstrate the continuity and general completeness of crystal graphs under slight atomic position perturbations. Moreover, by modeling PDD as global information and integrating it into matrix-based message passing, we significantly reduce computational costs. Comprehensive evaluation results show that WPDDFormer achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy across tasks on benchmark datasets such as the Materials Project and JARVIS-DFT. Xiangxiang Shen, Lingfeng Wen, Licheng Sun, Jian Yang 0034, Shing-Ho J. Lin, Xiao He 0004, Mingsong Chen 0001, Xian Wei |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion ModelabstractDiffusion generative models (DMs) have achieved promising results in image and graph generation. However, real-world graphs, such as social networks, molecular graphs, and traffic graphs, generally share non-Euclidean topologies and hidden hierarchies. For example, the degree distributions of graphs are mostly power-law distributions. The current latent diffusion model embeds the hierarchical data in a Euclidean space, which leads to distortions and interferes with modeling the distribution. Instead, hyperbolic space has been found to be more suitable for capturing complex hierarchical structures due to its exponential growth property. In order to simultaneously utilize the data generation capabilities of diffusion models and the ability of hyperbolic embeddings to extract latent hierarchical distributions, we propose a novel graph generation method called, Hyperbolic Graph Diffusion Model (HGDM), which consists of an auto-encoder to encode nodes into successive hyperbolic embeddings, and a DM that operates in the hyperbolic latent space. HGDM captures the crucial graph structure distributions by constructing a hyperbolic potential node space that incorporates edge information. Extensive experiments show that HGDM achieves better performance in generic graph and molecule generation benchmarks, with a 48% improvement in the quality of graph generation with highly hierarchical structures. Lingfeng Wen, Mingjie Ouyang, Xiangxiang Shen, Jian Yang 0034, Daxin Zhu, Mingsong Chen 0001, Xian Wei |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2019 | Exponential Moving Averaged Q-Network for DDPG
Xiangxiang Shen, Chuanhuan Yin, Yekun Chai, Xinwen Hou |
PRCV (1) | 1 |