Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harshavardhan Settibhaktini

dblp:252/0653 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4441-2018ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
speech processing
0.612022
Modeling Concurrent Vowel Scores Using the Time Delay Neural Network and Multitask Learning · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2022
Audio and music processing › auditory processing
auditory modeling
0.212022
Modeling Concurrent Vowel Scores Using the Time Delay Neural Network and Multitask Learning · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

auditory-nerve model · 1.2batch gradient descent · 0.72d convolutional neural network · 0.7time-delay neural network · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Predicting Level-Dependent Changes in Concurrent Vowel Scores Using the 2D-CNN Models
abstract
Differences in fundamental frequencies (F0s) are an important cue for segregating multiple speakers. However, the ability to avail this cue for identification varies with sound levels. For different-and same-F0 conditions, the identification scores of both vowels increased from low- to mid-levels and then reduced at higher levels for younger adults with normal hearing (YNH). These subjects benefited from the F0 difference; however, this benefit varied across the levels. The current study aims to develop a deep-neural-network (DNN) model that can predict the level-dependent changes in concurrent-vowel scores for YNH subjects. This DNN-model includes two-dimensional convolutional neural networks (2D-CNNs) in parallel, with the same architecture, to predict the concurrent-vowel scores. The input layer was neural responses of the auditory-nerve model to concurrent vowels. The 2D-CNN models were trained and validated using the subsets of the concurrent vowels from 50, 65, and 75 dB SPL for both F0 conditions, using the batch gradient descent algorithm. The trained model was then fine-tuned with a single epoch. The 2D-CNN models were evaluated against vowel levels (25 to 85 dB SPL) and F0 conditions. Compared with previous models, the current model accurately predicts the level-dependent changes in concurrent vowel scores for different-and same-F0 conditions.
Arsalan Malik, Nipun Agarwal, Harshavardhan Settibhaktini, Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.3
2022 Modeling Concurrent Vowel Scores Using the Time Delay Neural Network and Multitask Learning
abstract
The difference in fundamental frequency (F0) between vowels is a segregation cue for identifying concurrent vowels. Younger listeners with normal hearing (YNH) showed that the percent identification score of both vowels improved with increasing F0 difference and asymptoted at higher F0 difference. The current study developed a deep-neural-network model consisting of a time-delay neural network and multitask learning (TDNN-MTL) to predict the concurrent vowel scores. The input to the TDNN-MTL were temporal responses of concurrent vowels obtained using the auditory-nerve model. The TDNN-MTL was trained at a 3-Hz F0 difference until the score (80%) became closer to the YNH score (85%). The TDNN-MTL learned the formant coding and aided in the segregation of concurrent vowels into dominant and recessive vowels. The total weighted loss was tailored to mimic the dominant-recessive relationship of the YNH scores. The TDNN-MTL was tested against the other five F0 differences. The TDNN-MTL model scores of both vowels were successful in predicting the YNH scores. The chi-square tests revealed that the TDNN-MTL model scores correlated well with the YNH scores compared with other F0-segregation and multi-layer perceptron models. The TDNN-MTL also correctly predicted the one vowel identification scores and F0 benefit. These findings suggest that the trained TDNN-MTL accurately predicts the formant coding of the concurrent vowels across F0 differences, which aided in capturing the YNH scores. The TDNN-MTL can be extended to validate the behavioral studies on concurrent vowels obtained across acoustic (e.g., vowel duration and level) and auditory changes (e.g., aging and hearing loss).
Atharva Anand Joshi, Harshavardhan Settibhaktini, Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.2
2020 Modeling concurrent vowel identification for shorter durations
Harshavardhan Settibhaktini, Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
Speech Commun.1