EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Burmark
dblp:252/4593
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-3036-0108ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 61% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30% High-performance computing · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › cluster interconnect
infiniband |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An evaluation of the CORAL interconnects · SC 2019 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
interconnect benchmarking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An evaluation of the CORAL interconnects · SC 2019 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › high-speed networks
supercomputer interconnect |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | An evaluation of the CORAL interconnects · SC 2019 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputing systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | An evaluation of the CORAL interconnects · SC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
communication benchmarking · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cross-Architecture Performance Analysis Using the RAJA Performance SuiteabstractModern supercomputer architectures are diverse and becoming increasingly complex. Scientists are constantly porting code and re-optimizing it for the new architecture, but achieving good performance is challenging. Performance portability programming models such as RAJA, Kokkos, and OpenMP enable codes to maintain a single-source code rather than rewriting for each target architecture. However, portability models alone will not result in optimal performance as hardware has varying specifications (e.g., cache sizes and speeds) and parallel algorithms may use varying amounts of memory and compute resources. We present a systematic analysis of application behaviors across a diverse set of CPU and GPU hardware. We leverage the RAJA Performance Suite, which contains a curated set of kernels commonly found in HPC applications, to perform an in-depth GPU and memory analysis as well as a quantitative performance portability evaluation across different compute platforms. In analyzing the performance portability scores, we identify gaps and opportunities to achieve consistent performance across platforms. We provide a comprehensive analysis across seven architectures, including the most recent GPU systems with new physical memory layouts, where kernels demonstrate a runtime speedup of up to 44 ×. Although the speedup highlights the baseline improvements of newer hardware, the performance portability scores calculated, ranging from 0% to 92%, showcase where opportunities remain for scientists to increase utilization of the newer systems. Dewi Yokelson, Stephanie Brink, Jason Burmark, Michael McKinsey, Befikir Bogale, Ian Lumsden, Michela Taufer, Thomas Scogland, Olga Pearce |
ICPP | 3 |
| 2024 | Non-Blocking GPU-CPU Notifications to Enable More GPU-CPU ParallelismabstractGPUs are increasingly popular in HPC systems, and more applications are adopting GPUs each day. However, the control synchronization of GPUs with CPUs is suboptimal and only possible after GPU kernel termination points, resulting in serialized host and device tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel CPU-GPU notification method that enables non-blocking in-kernel control synchronization of device and host tasks in combination with persistent GPU kernels. Using this notification method, we increase the overlap of CPU and GPU execution and with that parallelism. We present the concept and structure of the proposed notification mechanism together with in-kernel GPU-CPU control synchronization, using halo-exchange as an example. We analyze the performance of the halo-exchange pattern using our new notification method, as well as the interference between CPU and GPU operations due to the execution overlap. Finally, we verify our results using a performance model covering the halo-exchange pattern with the new notification method. Bengisu Elis, Olga Pearce, David Böhme, Jason Burmark, Martin Schulz 0001 |
HPC Asia | 4 |
| 2019 | An evaluation of the CORAL interconnectsabstractThe US Department of Energy deployed the Summit and Sierra supercomputers with the latest state-of-the-art network interconnect technology in 2018 and both systems entered production in 2019. In this paper, we provide an in-depth assessment of the systems' network interconnects that are based on Enhanced Data Rate (EDR) 100 Gb/s Mellanox InfiniBand. Both systems use second-generation EDR Host Channel Adapters (HCAs) and switches with several new features such as Adaptive Routing (AR), switch-based collectives, and HCA-based tag matching. Although based on the same components, Summit's network is "non-blocking" (i.e., a fully provisioned Clos network) and Sierra's network has a 2:1 taper between the racks and aggregation switches. We evaluate the two systems' interconnects using traditional communication benchmarks as well as production applications. We find that the new Adaptive Routing dramatically improves performance but the other new features still need improvement. Christopher Zimmer 0001, Scott Atchley, Ramesh Pankajakshan, Brian E. Smith, Ian Karlin, Matthew L. Leininger, Adam Bertsch, Brian S. Ryujin, Jason Burmark, André Walker-Loud, Michael A. Clark, Olga Pearce |
SC | 9 |